The Highs and Lows of Simple Lexical Domain Adaptation Approaches for Neural Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine translation systems are vulnerable to domain mismatch, especially in a low-resource scenario. Out-of-domain translations are often of poor quality and prone to hallucinations, due to exposure bias and the decoder acting as a language model. We adopt two approaches to alleviate this problem: lexical shortlisting restricted by IBM statistical alignments, and hypothesis re-ranking based on similarity. The methods are computationally cheap, widely known, but not extensively experimented on domain adaptation. We demonstrate success on low-resource out-of-domain test sets, however, the methods are ineffective when there is sufficient data or too great domain mismatch. This is due to both the IBM model losing its advantage over the implicitly learned neural alignment, and issues with subword segmentation of out-of-domain words.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2021.
Builds on
14 of 28 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
- 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
- 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 202
- 2020On Exposure Bias, Hallucination and Domain Shift in Neural Machine Translationcited by 127
- 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimizationcited by 126
- 2019Bridging the Gap between Training and Inference for Neural Machine Translationcited by 123
- 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
- 2019Domain Robustness in Neural Machine Translationcited by 64
- 2019Microsoft Translator at WMT 2019: Towards Large-Scale Document-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022The Devil is in the Details: On the Pitfalls of Vocabulary Selection in Neural Machine Translationcited by 3
- 2023The Ups and Downs of Large Language Model Inference with Vocabulary Trimming by Language Heuristicscited by 3
- 2024Context and System Fusion in Post-ASR Emotion Recognition with Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2024Stolen Subwords: Importance of Vocabularies for Machine Translation Model Stealingcited by 0
- 2024Context and System Fusion in Post-ASR Emotion Recognition with Large Language Models4 Oct 2024
- 2024Stolen Subwords: Importance of Vocabularies for Machine Translation Model Stealing29 Jan 2024
- 2023The Ups and Downs of Large Language Model Inference with Vocabulary Trimming by Language Heuristics16 Nov 2023
- 2022The Devil is in the Details: On the Pitfalls of Vocabulary Selection in Neural Machine Translation13 May 2022