Assessing Sensitivity to Unconfoundedness: Estimation and Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper provides a set of methods for quantifying the robustness of treatment effects estimated using the unconfoundedness assumption (also known as selection on observables or conditional independence). Specifically, we estimate and do inference on bounds on various treatment effect parameters, like the average treatment effect (ATE) and the average effect of treatment on the treated (ATT), under nonparametric relaxations of the unconfoundedness assumption indexed by a scalar sensitivity parameter c. These relaxations allow for limited selection on unobservables, depending on the value of c. For large enough c, these bounds equal the no assumptions bounds. Using a non-standard bootstrap method, we show how to construct confidence bands for these bound functions which are uniform over all values of c. We illustrate these methods with an empirical application to effects of the National Supported Work Demonstration program. We implement these methods in a companion Stata module for easy use in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.
1 paper.
- 2021Causal inference with imperfect instrumental variablescited by 0
- 2021Causal inference with imperfect instrumental variables4 Nov 2021