On the Granularity of Explanations in Model Agnostic NLP Interpretability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current methods for Black-Box NLP interpretability, like LIME or SHAP, are based on altering the text to interpret by removing words and modeling the Black-Box response. In this paper, we outline limitations of this approach when using complex BERT-based classifiers: The word-based sampling produces texts that are out-of-distribution for the classifier and further gives rise to a high-dimensional search space, which can't be sufficiently explored when time or computation power is limited. Both of these challenges can be addressed by using segments as elementary building blocks for NLP interpretability. As illustration, we show that the simple choice of sentences greatly improves on both of these challenges. As a consequence, the resulting explainer attains much better fidelity on a benchmark classification task.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
3 papers.
- 2022An Attention Matrix for Every Decision: Faithfulness-based Arbitration Among Multiple Attention-Based Interpretations of Transformers in Text Classificationcited by 6
- 2024The FIX Benchmark: Extracting Features Interpretable to eXpertscited by 5
- 2024Explaining Black-box Model Predictions via Two-level Nested Feature Attributions with Consistency Propertycited by 0
- 2024The FIX Benchmark: Extracting Features Interpretable to eXperts20 Sep 2024
- 2024Explaining Black-box Model Predictions via Two-level Nested Feature Attributions with Consistency Property23 May 2024
- 2022An Attention Matrix for Every Decision: Faithfulness-based Arbitration Among Multiple Attention-Based Interpretations of Transformers in Text Classification22 Sep 2022