mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do We Really Need Scene-specific Pose Encoders?

arXiv 2012.12014 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2020cs.CV cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual pose regression models estimate the camera pose from a query image with a single forward pass. Current models learn pose encoding from an image using deep convolutional networks which are trained per scene. The resulting encoding is typically passed to a multi-layer perceptron in order to regress the pose. In this work, we propose that scene-specific pose encoders are not required for pose regression and that encodings trained for visual similarity can be used instead. In order to test our hypothesis, we take a shallow architecture of several fully connected layers and train it with pre-computed encodings from a generic image retrieval model. We find that these encodings are not only sufficient to regress the camera pose, but that, when provided to a branching fully connected architecture, a trained model can achieve competitive results and even surpass current textitstate-of-the-art pose regressors in some cases. Moreover, we show that for outdoor localization, the proposed architecture is the only pose regressor, to date, consistently localizing in under 2 meters and 5 degrees.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

10 papers.