A comparison of self-supervised speech representations as input features for unsupervised acoustic word embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many speech processing tasks involve measuring the acoustic similarity between speech segments. Acoustic word embeddings (AWE) allow for efficient comparisons by mapping speech segments of arbitrary duration to fixed-dimensional vectors. For zero-resource speech processing, where unlabelled speech is the only available resource, some of the best AWE approaches rely on weak top-down constraints in the form of automatically discovered word-like segments. Rather than learning embeddings at the segment level, another line of zero-resource research has looked at representation learning at the short-time frame level. Recent approaches include self-supervised predictive coding and correspondence autoencoder (CAE) models. In this paper we consider whether these frame-level features are beneficial when used as inputs for training to an unsupervised AWE model. We compare frame-level features from contrastive predictive coding (CPC), autoregressive predictive coding and a CAE to conventional MFCCs. These are used as inputs to a recurrent CAE-based AWE model. In a word discrimination task on English and Xitsonga data, all three representation learning approaches outperform MFCCs, with CPC consistently showing the biggest improvement. In cross-lingual experiments we find that CPC features trained on English can also be transferred to Xitsonga.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 5.
10 papers.
- 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Reviewcited by 258
- 2021Self-supervised representation learning from 12-lead ECG datacited by 80
- 2023What Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Know About Words?cited by 62
- 2022Analyzing Acoustic Word Embeddings from Pre-trained Self-supervised Speech Modelscited by 21
- 2023Generative Spoken Language Model based on continuous word-sized audio tokenscited by 19
- 2022Speech Sequence Embeddings using Nearest Neighbors Contrastive Learningcited by 7
- 2021Unsupervised Automatic Speech Recognition: A Reviewcited by 5
- 2023Acoustic Word Embeddings for Untranscribed Target Languages with Continued Pretraining and Learned Poolingcited by 2
- 2023Leveraging multilingual transfer for unsupervised semantic acoustic word embeddingscited by 2
- 2023Supervised Acoustic Embeddings And Their Transferability Across Languagescited by 1
- 2023Generative Spoken Language Model based on continuous word-sized audio tokens8 Oct 2023
- 2023Leveraging multilingual transfer for unsupervised semantic acoustic word embeddings5 Jul 2023
- 2023What Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Know About Words?30 Jun 2023
- 2023Acoustic Word Embeddings for Untranscribed Target Languages with Continued Pretraining and Learned Pooling3 Jun 2023
- 2023Supervised Acoustic Embeddings And Their Transferability Across Languages3 Jan 2023
- 2022Analyzing Acoustic Word Embeddings from Pre-trained Self-supervised Speech Models28 Oct 2022
- 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Review21 May 2022
- 2022Speech Sequence Embeddings using Nearest Neighbors Contrastive Learning11 Apr 2022
- 2021Unsupervised Automatic Speech Recognition: A Review9 Jun 2021
- 2021Self-supervised representation learning from 12-lead ECG data23 Mar 2021