mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Knowledge-Routed Visual Question Reasoning: Challenges for Deep Representation Embedding

arXiv 2012.07192 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2020cs.CVcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Though beneficial for encouraging the Visual Question Answering (VQA) models to discover the underlying knowledge by exploiting the input-output correlation beyond image and text contexts, the existing knowledge VQA datasets are mostly annotated in a crowdsource way, e.g., collecting questions and external reasons from different users via the internet. In addition to the challenge of knowledge reasoning, how to deal with the annotator bias also remains unsolved, which often leads to superficial over-fitted correlations between questions and answers. To address this issue, we propose a novel dataset named Knowledge-Routed Visual Question Reasoning for VQA model evaluation. Considering that a desirable VQA model should correctly perceive the image context, understand the question, and incorporate its learned knowledge, our proposed dataset aims to cutoff the shortcut learning exploited by the current deep embedding models and push the research boundary of the knowledge-based visual question reasoning. Specifically, we generate the question-answer pair based on both the Visual Genome scene graph and an external knowledge base with controlled programs to disentangle the knowledge from other biases. The programs can select one or two triplets from the scene graph or knowledge base to push multi-step reasoning, avoid answer ambiguity, and balanced the answer distribution. In contrast to the existing VQA datasets, we further imply the following two major constraints on the programs to incorporate knowledge reasoning: i) multiple knowledge triplets can be related to the question, but only one knowledge relates to the image object. This can enforce the VQA model to correctly perceive the image instead of guessing the knowledge based on the given question solely; ii) all questions are based on different knowledge, but the candidate answers are the same for both the training and test sets.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Natural Language Understanding and Inference with MLLM in Visual Question Answering: A Surveycited by 76
  2. 2022MuKEA: Multimodal Knowledge Extraction and Accumulation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answeringcited by 36
  3. 2022Causal Reasoning Meets Visual Representation Learning: A Prospective Studycited by 24
  4. 2022VQA-GNN: Reasoning with Multimodal Knowledge via Graph Neural Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 22
  5. 2022VQA and Visual Reasoning: An Overview of Recent Datasets, Methods and Challengescited by 14
  6. 2023Combo of Thinking and Observing for Outside-Knowledge VQAcited by 9
  7. 2022Dynamic Key-value Memory Enhanced Multi-step Graph Reasoning for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answeringcited by 7
  8. 2021Language bias in Visual Question Answering: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 6
  9. 2024Knowledge Condensation and Reasoning for Knowledge-based VQAcited by 3
  10. 2022Can Open Domain Question Answering Systems Answer Visual Knowledge Questions?cited by 2
  11. 2024Answering from Sure to Uncertain: Uncertainty-Aware Curriculum Learning for Video Question Answeringcited by 2
  12. 2025Augmented Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Reviewcited by 1
4 more
  1. 2023GNN2R: Weakly-Supervised Rationale-Providing Question Answering over Knowledge Graphscited by 0
  2. 2024S2DN: Learning to Denoise Unconvincing Knowledge for Inductive Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 0
  3. 2025Admitting Ignorance Helps the Video Question Answering Models to Answercited by 0
  4. 2025VisualQuest: A Benchmark for Abstract Visual Reasoning in MLLMscited by 0