Automatic Test Suite Generation for Key-Points Detection DNNs using Many-Objective Search (Experience Paper)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatically detecting the positions of key-points (e.g., facial key-points or finger key-points) in an image is an essential problem in many applications, such as driver's gaze detection and drowsiness detection in automated driving systems. With the recent advances of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), Key-Points detection DNNs (KP-DNNs) have been increasingly employed for that purpose. Nevertheless, KP-DNN testing and validation have remained a challenging problem because KP-DNNs predict many independent key-points at the same time -- where each individual key-point may be critical in the targeted application -- and images can vary a great deal according to many factors. In this paper, we present an approach to automatically generate test data for KP-DNNs using many-objective search. In our experiments, focused on facial key-points detection DNNs developed for an industrial automotive application, we show that our approach can generate test suites to severely mispredict, on average, more than 93% of all key-points. In comparison, random search-based test data generation can only severely mispredict 41% of them. Many of these mispredictions, however, are not avoidable and should not therefore be considered failures. We also empirically compare state-of-the-art, many-objective search algorithms and their variants, tailored for test suite generation. Furthermore, we investigate and demonstrate how to learn specific conditions, based on image characteristics (e.g., head posture and skin color), that lead to severe mispredictions. Such conditions serve as a basis for risk analysis or DNN retraining.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Ergo, SMIRK is Safe: A Safety Case for a Machine Learning Component in a Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Brake Systemcited by 14
- 2022A Search-Based Testing Approach for Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 12
- 2022Black-box Safety Analysis and Retraining of DNNs based on Feature Extraction and Clusteringcited by 8
- 2022Machine Learning Testing in an ADAS Case Study Using Simulation-Integrated Bio-Inspired Search-Based Testingcited by 4
- 2022Simulator-based explanation and debugging of hazard-triggering events in DNN-based safety-critical systemscited by 4
- 2021Improving Test Case Generation for REST APIs Through Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 3
- 2023Supporting Safety Analysis of Image-processing DNNs through Clustering-based Approachescited by 2
- 2025GAN-enhanced Simulation-driven DNN Testing in Absence of Ground Truthcited by 0
- 2026Search-based Testing of Vision Language Models for In-Car Scene Understandingcited by 0
- 2026Search-based Testing of Vision Language Models for In-Car Scene Understanding2 Jul 2026
- 2025GAN-enhanced Simulation-driven DNN Testing in Absence of Ground Truth20 Mar 2025
- 2023Supporting Safety Analysis of Image-processing DNNs through Clustering-based Approaches31 Jan 2023
- 2022A Search-Based Testing Approach for Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents15 Jun 2022
- 2022Ergo, SMIRK is Safe: A Safety Case for a Machine Learning Component in a Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Brake System16 Apr 2022
- 2022Simulator-based explanation and debugging of hazard-triggering events in DNN-based safety-critical systems1 Apr 2022
- 2022Machine Learning Testing in an ADAS Case Study Using Simulation-Integrated Bio-Inspired Search-Based Testing22 Mar 2022
- 2022Black-box Safety Analysis and Retraining of DNNs based on Feature Extraction and Clustering13 Jan 2022
- 2021Improving Test Case Generation for REST APIs Through Hierarchical Clustering14 Sep 2021