mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SPAA: Stealthy Projector-based Adversarial Attacks on Deep Image Classifiers

arXiv 2012.05858 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2020cs.CVcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Light-based adversarial attacks use spatial augmented reality (SAR) techniques to fool image classifiers by altering the physical light condition with a controllable light source, e.g., a projector. Compared with physical attacks that place hand-crafted adversarial objects, projector-based ones obviate modifying the physical entities, and can be performed transiently and dynamically by altering the projection pattern. However, subtle light perturbations are insufficient to fool image classifiers, due to the complex environment and project-and-capture process. Thus, existing approaches focus on projecting clearly perceptible adversarial patterns, while the more interesting yet challenging goal, stealthy projector-based attack, remains open. In this paper, for the first time, we formulate this problem as an end-to-end differentiable process and propose a Stealthy Projector-based Adversarial Attack (SPAA) solution. In SPAA, we approximate the real Project-and-Capture process using a deep neural network named PCNet, then we include PCNet in the optimization of projector-based attacks such that the generated adversarial projection is physically plausible. Finally, to generate both robust and stealthy adversarial projections, we propose an algorithm that uses minimum perturbation and adversarial confidence thresholds to alternate between the adversarial loss and stealthiness loss optimization. Our experimental evaluations show that SPAA clearly outperforms other methods by achieving higher attack success rates and meanwhile being stealthier, for both targeted and untargeted attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
  2. 2022Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Surveycited by 66
  3. 2022A Survey on Physical Adversarial Attack in Computer Visioncited by 24
  4. 2023RFLA: A Stealthy Reflected Light Adversarial Attack in the Physical Worldcited by 23
  5. 2023Physical Adversarial Attacks For Camera-based Smart Systems: Current Trends, Categorization, Applications, Research Challenges, and Future Outlookcited by 20
  6. 2023Adversarial Examples in the Physical World: A Surveycited by 10
  7. 2025Safety of Embodied Navigation: A Surveycited by 9
  8. 2023State-of-the-art optical-based physical adversarial attacks for deep learning computer vision systemscited by 8
  9. 2024Machine Learning Robustness: A Primercited by 8
  10. 2022Adversarial Neon Beam: A Light-based Physical Attack to DNNscited by 6
  11. 2023REVAMP: Automated Simulations of Adversarial Attacks on Arbitrary Objects in Realistic Scenescited by 2
  12. 2025LAPIG: Language Guided Projector Image Generation with Surface Adaptation and Stylizationcited by 2
5 more
  1. 2025A Survey of Adversarial Defenses in Vision-based Systems: Categorization, Methods and Challengescited by 1
  2. 2025Towards Benchmarking and Assessing the Safety and Robustness of Autonomous Driving on Safety-critical Scenarioscited by 1
  3. 2023Adaptive Local Adversarial Attacks on 3D Point Clouds for Augmented Realitycited by 0
  4. 2025CAPAA: Classifier-Agnostic Projector-Based Adversarial Attackcited by 0
  5. 2026XSPA: Crafting Imperceptible X-Shaped Sparse Adversarial Perturbations for Transferable Attacks on VLMscited by 0