mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Sample Complexity of Policy Gradient Finding Second-Order Stationary Points

arXiv 2012.01491 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2020cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The goal of policy-based reinforcement learning (RL) is to search the maximal point of its objective. However, due to the inherent non-concavity of its objective, convergence to a first-order stationary point (FOSP) can not guarantee the policy gradient methods finding a maximal point. A FOSP can be a minimal or even a saddle point, which is undesirable for RL. Fortunately, if all the saddle points are strict, all the second-order stationary points (SOSP) are exactly equivalent to local maxima. Instead of FOSP, we consider SOSP as the convergence criteria to character the sample complexity of policy gradient. Our result shows that policy gradient converges to an (ε,√εchi)-SOSP with probability at least 1-widetildeO(δ) after the total cost of Oleft(dfracε^-frac92(1-γ)√chilogdfrac1δright), where γ∈(0,1). Our result improves the state-of-the-art result significantly where it requires Oleft(dfracε-9chi^frac32δlogdfrac1εchiright). Our analysis is based on the key idea that decomposes the parameter space ℝp into three non-intersected regions: non-stationary point, saddle point, and local optimal region, then making a local improvement of the objective of RL in each region. This technique can be potentially generalized to extensive policy gradient methods.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: