Autonomous Graph Mining Algorithm Search with Best Speed/Accuracy Trade-off
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph data is ubiquitous in academia and industry, from social networks to bioinformatics. The pervasiveness of graphs today has raised the demand for algorithms that can answer various questions: Which products would a user like to purchase given her order list? Which users are buying fake followers to increase their public reputation? Myriads of new graph mining algorithms are proposed every year to answer such questions - each with a distinct problem formulation, computational time, and memory footprint. This lack of unity makes it difficult for a practitioner to compare different algorithms and pick the most suitable one for a specific application. These challenges - even more severe for non-experts - create a gap in which state-of-the-art techniques developed in academic settings fail to be optimally deployed in real-world applications. To bridge this gap, we propose AUTOGM, an automated system for graph mining algorithm development. We first define a unified framework UNIFIEDGM that integrates various message-passing based graph algorithms, ranging from conventional algorithms like PageRank to graph neural networks. Then UNIFIEDGM defines a search space in which five parameters are required to determine a graph algorithm. Under this search space, AUTOGM explicitly optimizes for the optimal parameter set of UNIFIEDGM using Bayesian Optimization. AUTOGM defines a novel budget-aware objective function for the optimization to incorporate a practical issue - finding the best speed-accuracy trade-off under a computation budget - into the graph algorithm generation problem. Experiments on real-world benchmark datasets demonstrate that AUTOGM generates novel graph mining algorithms with the best speed/accuracy trade-off compared to existing models with heuristic parameters.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021Automated Machine Learning on Graphs: A Surveycited by 39
- 2021Pooling Architecture Search for Graph Classificationcited by 36
- 2022Automated Graph Machine Learning: Approaches, Libraries, Benchmarks and Directionscited by 9
- 2022Enhancing Intra-class Information Extraction for Heterophilous Graphs: One Neural Architecture Search Approachcited by 2
- 2026Relatron: Automating Relational Machine Learning over Relational Databasescited by 2
- 2022Bridging the Gap of AutoGraph between Academia and Industry: Analysing AutoGraph Challenge at KDD Cup 2020cited by 0
- 2026Relatron: Automating Relational Machine Learning over Relational Databases26 Feb 2026
- 2022Enhancing Intra-class Information Extraction for Heterophilous Graphs: One Neural Architecture Search Approach20 Nov 2022
- 2022Bridging the Gap of AutoGraph between Academia and Industry: Analysing AutoGraph Challenge at KDD Cup 20206 Apr 2022
- 2022Automated Graph Machine Learning: Approaches, Libraries, Benchmarks and Directions4 Jan 2022
- 2021Pooling Architecture Search for Graph Classification24 Aug 2021
- 2021Automated Machine Learning on Graphs: A Survey1 Mar 2021