Avoiding Tampering Incentives in Deep RL via Decoupled Approval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How can we design agents that pursue a given objective when all feedback mechanisms are influenceable by the agent? Standard RL algorithms assume a secure reward function, and can thus perform poorly in settings where agents can tamper with the reward-generating mechanism. We present a principled solution to the problem of learning from influenceable feedback, which combines approval with a decoupled feedback collection procedure. For a natural class of corruption functions, decoupled approval algorithms have aligned incentives both at convergence and for their local updates. Empirically, they also scale to complex 3D environments where tampering is possible.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
- 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 203
- 2024Sycophancy to Subterfuge: Investigating Reward-Tampering in Large Language Modelscited by 178
- 2022Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?cited by 105
- 2025100 Days After DeepSeek-R1: A Survey on Replication Studies and More Directions for Reasoning Language Modelscited by 30
- 2022Path-Specific Objectives for Safer Agent Incentivescited by 20
- 2025MONA: Myopic Optimization with Non-myopic Approval Can Mitigate Multi-step Reward Hackingcited by 19
- 2025Sailing by the Stars: A Survey on Reward Models and Learning Strategies for Learning from Rewardscited by 14
- 2023Incentivizing honest performative predictions with proper scoring rulescited by 9
- 2026Do Agent Benchmarks Measure Capability? Protocol Validity in the Age of Agentic AIcited by 6
- 2025RIVAL: Reinforcement Learning with Iterative and Adversarial Optimization for Machine Translationcited by 4
- 2024Agents Need Not Know Their Purposecited by 0
- 2026Do Agent Benchmarks Measure Capability? Protocol Validity in the Age of Agentic AI24 Jul 2026
- 2025RIVAL: Reinforcement Learning with Iterative and Adversarial Optimization for Machine Translation5 Jun 2025
- 2025Sailing by the Stars: A Survey on Reward Models and Learning Strategies for Learning from Rewards5 May 2025
- 2025100 Days After DeepSeek-R1: A Survey on Replication Studies and More Directions for Reasoning Language Models1 May 2025
- 2025MONA: Myopic Optimization with Non-myopic Approval Can Mitigate Multi-step Reward Hacking22 Jan 2025
- 2024Sycophancy to Subterfuge: Investigating Reward-Tampering in Large Language Models14 Jun 2024
- 2024Agents Need Not Know Their Purpose15 Feb 2024
- 2023Incentivizing honest performative predictions with proper scoring rules28 May 2023
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov 2022
- 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hacking27 Sep 2022
- 2022Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?16 Jun 2022
- 2022Path-Specific Objectives for Safer Agent Incentives21 Apr 2022