The Forchheim Image Database for Camera Identification in the Wild
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image provenance can represent crucial knowledge in criminal investigation and journalistic fact checking. In the last two decades, numerous algorithms have been proposed for obtaining information on the source camera and distribution history of an image. For a fair ranking of these techniques, it is important to rigorously assess their performance on practically relevant test cases. To this end, a number of datasets have been proposed. However, we argue that there is a gap in existing databases: to our knowledge, there is currently no dataset that simultaneously satisfies two goals, namely a) to cleanly separate scene content and forensic traces, and b) to support realistic post-processing like social media recompression. In this work, we propose the Forchheim Image Database (FODB) to close this gap. It consists of more than 23,000 images of 143 scenes by 27 smartphone cameras, and it allows to cleanly separate image content from forensic artifacts. Each image is provided in 6 different qualities: the original camera-native version, and five copies from social networks. We demonstrate the usefulness of FODB in an evaluation of methods for camera identification. We report three findings. First, the recently proposed general-purpose EfficientNet remarkably outperforms several dedicated forensic CNNs both on clean and compressed images. Second, classifiers obtain a performance boost even on unknown post-processing after augmentation by artificial degradations. Third, FODB's clean separation of scene content and forensic traces imposes important, rigorous boundary conditions for algorithm benchmarking.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024Any-Resolution AI-Generated Image Detection by Spectral Learningcited by 57
- 2024Community Forensics: Using Thousands of Generators to Train Fake Image Detectorscited by 50
- 2024Evolution of Detection Performance throughout the Online Lifespan of Synthetic Imagescited by 8
- 2023TrainFors: A Large Benchmark Training Dataset for Image Manipulation Detection and Localizationcited by 5
- 2022SISL:Self-Supervised Image Signature Learning for Splicing Detection and Localizationcited by 3
- 2024Landscape More Secure Than Portrait? Zooming Into the Directionality of Digital Images With Security Implicationscited by 2
- 2022Deep Metric Color Embeddings for Splicing Localization in Severely Degraded Imagescited by 0
- 2025Camera Model Identification with SPAIR-Swin and Entropy based Non-Homogeneous Patchescited by 0
- 2025PRNU-Bench: A Novel Benchmark and Model for PRNU-Based Camera Identificationcited by 0
- 2026Choosing a JPEG Decoder for PyTorch DataLoaders: Workload-Specific Throughput on Four CPUscited by 0
- 2026Choosing a JPEG Decoder for PyTorch DataLoaders: Workload-Specific Throughput on Four CPUs9 May 2026
- 2025PRNU-Bench: A Novel Benchmark and Model for PRNU-Based Camera Identification22 Sep 2025
- 2025Camera Model Identification with SPAIR-Swin and Entropy based Non-Homogeneous Patches28 Mar 2025
- 2024Any-Resolution AI-Generated Image Detection by Spectral Learning28 Nov 2024
- 2024Community Forensics: Using Thousands of Generators to Train Fake Image Detectors6 Nov 2024
- 2024Evolution of Detection Performance throughout the Online Lifespan of Synthetic Images21 Aug 2024
- 2024Landscape More Secure Than Portrait? Zooming Into the Directionality of Digital Images With Security Implications21 Jun 2024
- 2023TrainFors: A Large Benchmark Training Dataset for Image Manipulation Detection and Localization10 Aug 2023
- 2022Deep Metric Color Embeddings for Splicing Localization in Severely Degraded Images21 Jun 2022
- 2022SISL:Self-Supervised Image Signature Learning for Splicing Detection and Localization15 Mar 2022