mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Progressive Voice Trigger Detection: Accuracy vs Latency

arXiv 2010.15446 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2020eess.AS cs.HC cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an architecture for voice trigger detection for virtual assistants. The main idea in this work is to exploit information in words that immediately follow the trigger phrase. We first demonstrate that by including more audio context after a detected trigger phrase, we can indeed get a more accurate decision. However, waiting to listen to more audio each time incurs a latency increase. Progressive Voice Trigger Detection allows us to trade-off latency and accuracy by accepting clear trigger candidates quickly, but waiting for more context to decide whether to accept more marginal examples. Using a two-stage architecture, we show that by delaying the decision for just 3% of detected true triggers in the test set, we are able to obtain a relative improvement of 66% in false rejection rate, while incurring only a negligible increase in latency.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 2.

6 papers.