mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Theory-based residual neural networks: A synergy of discrete choice models and deep neural networks

arXiv 2010.11644 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2020cs.LG econ.EMcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Researchers often treat data-driven and theory-driven models as two disparate or even conflicting methods in travel behavior analysis. However, the two methods are highly complementary because data-driven methods are more predictive but less interpretable and robust, while theory-driven methods are more interpretable and robust but less predictive. Using their complementary nature, this study designs a theory-based residual neural network (TB-ResNet) framework, which synergizes discrete choice models (DCMs) and deep neural networks (DNNs) based on their shared utility interpretation. The TB-ResNet framework is simple, as it uses a (δ, 1-δ) weighting to take advantage of DCMs' simplicity and DNNs' richness, and to prevent underfitting from the DCMs and overfitting from the DNNs. This framework is also flexible: three instances of TB-ResNets are designed based on multinomial logit model (MNL-ResNets), prospect theory (PT-ResNets), and hyperbolic discounting (HD-ResNets), which are tested on three data sets. Compared to pure DCMs, the TB-ResNets provide greater prediction accuracy and reveal a richer set of behavioral mechanisms owing to the utility function augmented by the DNN component in the TB-ResNets. Compared to pure DNNs, the TB-ResNets can modestly improve prediction and significantly improve interpretation and robustness, because the DCM component in the TB-ResNets stabilizes the utility functions and input gradients. Overall, this study demonstrates that it is both feasible and desirable to synergize DCMs and DNNs by combining their utility specifications under a TB-ResNet framework. Although some limitations remain, this TB-ResNet framework is an important first step to create mutual benefits between DCMs and DNNs for travel behavior modeling, with joint improvement in prediction, interpretation, and robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Representing Random Utility Choice Models with Neural Networkscited by 13
  2. 2023Fairness-enhancing deep learning for ride-hailing demand predictioncited by 9
  3. 2023Deep hybrid model with satellite imagery: how to combine demand modeling and computer vision for behavior analysis?cited by 8
  4. 2023Deep trip generation with graph neural networks for bike sharing system expansioncited by 8
  5. 2025Aligning LLM with human travel choices: a persona-based embedding learning approachcited by 7
  6. 2024Deep neural networks for choice analysis: Enhancing behavioral regularity with gradient regularizationcited by 5
  7. 2023A prediction and behavioural analysis of machine learning methods for modelling travel mode choicecited by 4
  8. 2024Enhancing Travel Choice Modeling with Large Language Models: A Prompt-Learning Approachcited by 3
  9. 2021A variational autoencoder approach for choice set generation and implicit perception of alternatives in choice modelingcited by 2
  10. 2023Deep Learning in Computational Biology: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Outlookcited by 2
  11. 2023Images in Discrete Choice Modeling: Addressing Data Isomorphism in Multi-Modality Inputscited by 1
  12. 2025Bayesian Deep Learning for Discrete Choicecited by 0
3 more
  1. 2025Graph neural networks for residential location choice: connection to classical logit modelscited by 0
  2. 2025DeepLogit: A sequentially constrained explainable deep learning modeling approach for transport policy analysiscited by 0
  3. 2026Neural-Bayesian Structure Learning for Discrete Choice Modelingcited by 0