mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Incorporating Stylistic Lexical Preferences in Generative Language Models

arXiv 2010.11553 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2020cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

While recent advances in language modeling have resulted in powerful generation models, their generation style remains implicitly dependent on the training data and can not emulate a specific target style. Leveraging the generative capabilities of a transformer-based language models, we present an approach to induce certain target-author attributes by incorporating continuous multi-dimensional lexical preferences of an author into generative language models. We introduce rewarding strategies in a reinforcement learning framework that encourages the use of words across multiple categorical dimensions, to varying extents. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach can generate text that distinctively aligns with a given target author's lexical style. We conduct quantitative and qualitative comparisons with competitive and relevant baselines to illustrate the benefits of the proposed approach.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2020.

Builds on

14 of 21 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  4. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  5. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  6. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  7. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
  8. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 547
  9. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 365
  10. 2019Stabilizing Transformers for Reinforcement Learningcited by 270
  11. 2017Paraphrase Generation with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
  12. 2019Adapting Language Models for Non-Parallel Author-Stylized Rewritingcited by 23
2 more
  1. 2013Complexity of Word Collocation Networks: A Preliminary Structural Analysiscited by 17
  2. 2019A Lexical, Syntactic, and Semantic Perspective for Understanding Style in Textcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Robust Preference Learning for Storytelling via Contrastive Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026PrefReward: Learning User Preference Matrix for Personalized Text Generation
  3. 2024Beyond Sparse Rewards: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Language Model Critique in Text Generation
  4. 2025LongWriter-Zero: Mastering Ultra-Long Text Generation via Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026CE-RM: A Pointwise Generative Reward Model Optimized via Two-Stage Rollout and Unified Criteria
  6. 2024Style Transfer with Multi-iteration Preference Optimization
  7. 2024Dynamic Multi-Reward Weighting for Multi-Style Controllable Generation
  8. 2026Characterising Toxicity in Generative Large Language Models