mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Online Learning with Vector Costs and Bandits with Knapsacks

arXiv 2010.07346 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2020cs.LG cs.DS cs.GTcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce online learning with vector costs (OLVCp) where in each time step t ∈ 1,ldots, T, we need to play an action i ∈ 1,ldots,n that incurs an unknown vector cost in [0,1]d. The goal of the online algorithm is to minimize the ℓp norm of the sum of its cost vectors. This captures the classical online learning setting for d=1, and is interesting for general d because of applications like online scheduling where we want to balance the load between different machines (dimensions). We study OLVCp in both stochastic and adversarial arrival settings, and give a general procedure to reduce the problem from d dimensions to a single dimension. This allows us to use classical online learning algorithms in both full and bandit feedback models to obtain (near) optimal results. In particular, we obtain a single algorithm (up to the choice of learning rate) that gives sublinear regret for stochastic arrivals and a tight O(minp, log d) competitive ratio for adversarial arrivals. The OLVCp problem also occurs as a natural subproblem when trying to solve the popular Bandits with Knapsacks (BwK) problem. This connection allows us to use our OLVCp techniques to obtain (near) optimal results for BwK in both stochastic and adversarial settings. In particular, we obtain a tight O(log d · log T) competitive ratio algorithm for adversarial BwK, which improves over the O(d · log T) competitive ratio algorithm of Immorlica et al. [FOCS'19].

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Contextual Bandits with Packing and Covering Constraints: A Modular Lagrangian Approach via Regressioncited by 30
  2. 2021Online Minimax Multiobjective Optimization: Multicalibeating and Other Applicationscited by 26
  3. 2023No-Regret Learning in Bilateral Trade via Global Budget Balancecited by 17
  4. 2021The Symmetry between Arms and Knapsacks: A Primal-Dual Approach for Bandits with Knapsackscited by 16
  5. 2024Beyond Primal-Dual Methods in Bandits with Stochastic and Adversarial Constraintscited by 10
  6. 2024No-Regret Algorithms in non-Truthful Auctions with Budget and ROI Constraintscited by 9
  7. 2022Mitigating Disparity while Maximizing Reward: Tight Anytime Guarantee for Improving Banditscited by 8
  8. 2023Approximately Stationary Bandits with Knapsackscited by 6
  9. 2024No-Regret is not enough! Bandits with General Constraints through Adaptive Regret Minimizationcited by 6
  10. 2023Online Learning under Budget and ROI Constraints via Weak Adaptivitycited by 5
  11. 2025No-Regret Learning Under Adversarial Resource Constraints: A Spending Plan Is All You Need!cited by 5
  12. 2022Best of Many Worlds Guarantees for Online Learning with Knapsackscited by 4
8 more
  1. 2025Near-Optimal Online Deployment and Routing for Streaming LLMscited by 3
  2. 2025A New Benchmark for Online Learning with Budget-Balancing Constraintscited by 2
  3. 2025Online Learning in the Random Order Modelcited by 2
  4. 2026Adaptive Multi-Round Allocation with Stochastic Arrivalscited by 1
  5. 2023Allocating Divisible Resources on Arms with Unknown and Random Rewardscited by 0
  6. 2023Clustered Linear Contextual Bandits with Knapsackscited by 0
  7. 2024Dataset Representativeness and Downstream Task Fairnesscited by 0
  8. 2025Multi-Objective textitmin-max Online Convex Optimizationcited by 0