Self-Supervised Ranking for Representation Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a new framework for self-supervised representation learning by formulating it as a ranking problem in an image retrieval context on a large number of random views (augmentations) obtained from images. Our work is based on two intuitions: first, a good representation of images must yield a high-quality image ranking in a retrieval task; second, we would expect random views of an image to be ranked closer to a reference view of that image than random views of other images. Hence, we model representation learning as a learning to rank problem for image retrieval. We train a representation encoder by maximizing average precision (AP) for ranking, where random views of an image are considered positively related, and that of the other images considered negatives. The new framework, dubbed S2R2, enables computing a global objective on multiple views, compared to the local objective in the popular contrastive learning framework, which is calculated on pairs of views. In principle, by using a ranking criterion, we eliminate reliance on object-centric curated datasets. When trained on STL10 and MS-COCO, S2R2 outperforms SimCLR and the clustering-based contrastive learning model, SwAV, while being much simpler both conceptually and at implementation. On MS-COCO, S2R2 outperforms both SwAV and SimCLR with a larger margin than on STl10. This indicates that S2R2 is more effective on diverse scenes and could eliminate the need for an object-centric large training dataset for self-supervised representation learning.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021When Does Contrastive Visual Representation Learning Work?cited by 92
- 2022TransRank: Self-supervised Video Representation Learning via Ranking-based Transformation Recognitioncited by 10
- 2021Inter-intra Variant Dual Representations forSelf-supervised Video Recognitioncited by 5
- 2022Do Lessons from Metric Learning Generalize to Image-Caption Retrieval?cited by 3
- 2023Scene-centric vs. Object-centric Image-Text Cross-modal Retrieval: A Reproducibility Studycited by 3
- 2024Can Generative Models Improve Self-Supervised Representation Learning?cited by 3
- 2025Task-Agnostic Attacks Against Vision Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2021Representation Learning by Ranking across multiple taskscited by 0
- 2022Less than Few: Self-Shot Video Instance Segmentationcited by 0
- 2025Image-Seeking Intent Prediction for Cross-Device Product Searchcited by 0
- 2025Image-Seeking Intent Prediction for Cross-Device Product Search16 Sep 2025
- 2025Task-Agnostic Attacks Against Vision Foundation Models5 Mar 2025
- 2024Can Generative Models Improve Self-Supervised Representation Learning?9 Mar 2024
- 2023Scene-centric vs. Object-centric Image-Text Cross-modal Retrieval: A Reproducibility Study12 Jan 2023
- 2022TransRank: Self-supervised Video Representation Learning via Ranking-based Transformation Recognition4 May 2022
- 2022Less than Few: Self-Shot Video Instance Segmentation19 Apr 2022
- 2022Do Lessons from Metric Learning Generalize to Image-Caption Retrieval?14 Feb 2022
- 2021Inter-intra Variant Dual Representations forSelf-supervised Video Recognition2 Jul 2021
- 2021When Does Contrastive Visual Representation Learning Work?12 May 2021
- 2021Representation Learning by Ranking across multiple tasks28 Mar 2021