Power in Liquid Democracy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The paper develops a theory of power for delegable proxy voting systems. We define a power index able to measure the influence of both voters and delegators. Using this index, which we characterize axiomatically, we extend an earlier game-theoretic model by incorporating power-seeking behavior by agents. We analytically study the existence of pure strategy Nash equilibria in such a model. Finally, by means of simulations, we study the effect of relevant parameters on the emergence of power inequalities in the model.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021Unravelling multi-agent ranked delegationscited by 3
- 2021When Can Liquid Democracy Unveil the Truth?cited by 2
- 2023Measuring a Priori Voting Power -- Taking Delegations Seriouslycited by 1
- 2025The Cost Perspective of Liquid Democracy: Feasibility and Controlcited by 1
- 2021Computation and Bribery of Voting Power in Delegative Simple Gamescited by 0
- 2022Pandering in a Flexible Representative Democracycited by 0
- 2026Swimming with Whales: Analysis of Power Imbalances in Stake-Weighted Governancecited by 0
- 2026Swimming with Whales: Analysis of Power Imbalances in Stake-Weighted Governance19 May 2026
- 2025The Cost Perspective of Liquid Democracy: Feasibility and Control4 Feb 2025
- 2023Measuring a Priori Voting Power -- Taking Delegations Seriously6 Jan 2023
- 2022Pandering in a Flexible Representative Democracy18 Nov 2022
- 2021Unravelling multi-agent ranked delegations25 Nov 2021
- 2021Computation and Bribery of Voting Power in Delegative Simple Games8 Apr 2021
- 2021When Can Liquid Democracy Unveil the Truth?5 Apr 2021