Relative Depth Estimation as a Ranking Problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a formulation of the relative depth estimation from a single image problem, as a ranking problem. By reformulating the problem this way, we were able to utilize literature on the ranking problem, and apply the existing knowledge to achieve better results. To this end, we have introduced a listwise ranking loss borrowed from ranking literature, weighted ListMLE, to the relative depth estimation problem. We have also brought a new metric which considers pixel depth ranking accuracy, on which our method is stronger.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Single Image Depth Estimation: An Overviewcited by 35
- 2024Learning with Unreliability: Fast Few-shot Voxel Radiance Fields with Relative Geometric Consistencycited by 6
- 2023Depth-Relative Self Attention for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 1
- 2022RLSEP: Learning Label Ranks for Multi-label Classificationcited by 0
- 2024Learning with Unreliability: Fast Few-shot Voxel Radiance Fields with Relative Geometric Consistency26 Mar 2024
- 2023Depth-Relative Self Attention for Monocular Depth Estimation25 Apr 2023
- 2022RLSEP: Learning Label Ranks for Multi-label Classification8 Dec 2022
- 2021Single Image Depth Estimation: An Overview13 Apr 2021