Model Selection for Cross-Lingual Transfer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformers that are pre-trained on multilingual corpora, such as, mBERT and XLM-RoBERTa, have achieved impressive cross-lingual transfer capabilities. In the zero-shot transfer setting, only English training data is used, and the fine-tuned model is evaluated on another target language. While this works surprisingly well, substantial variance has been observed in target language performance between different fine-tuning runs, and in the zero-shot setup, no target-language development data is available to select among multiple fine-tuned models. Prior work has relied on English dev data to select among models that are fine-tuned with different learning rates, number of steps and other hyperparameters, often resulting in suboptimal choices. In this paper, we show that it is possible to select consistently better models when small amounts of annotated data are available in auxiliary pivot languages. We propose a machine learning approach to model selection that uses the fine-tuned model's own internal representations to predict its cross-lingual capabilities. In extensive experiments we find that this method consistently selects better models than English validation data across twenty five languages (including eight low-resource languages), and often achieves results that are comparable to model selection using target language development data.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Frustratingly Easy Label Projection for Cross-lingual Transfercited by 33
- 2023Zero-shot cross-lingual transfer language selection using linguistic similaritycited by 28
- 2023Why Does Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Generation Fail? An Explanation and a Solutioncited by 22
- 2023Contextual Label Projection for Cross-Lingual Structured Predictioncited by 9
- 2024Constrained Decoding for Cross-lingual Label Projectioncited by 8
- 2024Text Generation Models for Luxembourgish with Limited Data: A Balanced Multilingual Strategycited by 7
- 2023Meta-Tuning LLMs to Leverage Lexical Knowledge for Generalizable Language Style Understandingcited by 4
- 2025Anticipatory Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Language Distances are Practical for Equitable Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 0
- 2026Language Distances are Practical for Equitable Cross-Lingual Transfer26 Sep 2026
- 2025Anticipatory Evaluation of Language Models25 Sep 2025
- 2024Text Generation Models for Luxembourgish with Limited Data: A Balanced Multilingual Strategy12 Dec 2024
- 2024Constrained Decoding for Cross-lingual Label Projection5 Feb 2024
- 2023Contextual Label Projection for Cross-Lingual Structured Prediction16 Sep 2023
- 2023Why Does Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Generation Fail? An Explanation and a Solution27 May 2023
- 2023Meta-Tuning LLMs to Leverage Lexical Knowledge for Generalizable Language Style Understanding24 May 2023
- 2023Zero-shot cross-lingual transfer language selection using linguistic similarity31 Jan 2023
- 2022Frustratingly Easy Label Projection for Cross-lingual Transfer28 Nov 2022