mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Black-Box Optimization Revisited: Improving Algorithm Selection Wizards through Massive Benchmarking

arXiv 2010.04542 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2020cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing studies in black-box optimization for machine learning suffer from low generalizability, caused by a typically selective choice of problem instances used for training and testing different optimization algorithms. Among other issues, this practice promotes overfitting and poor-performing user guidelines. To address this shortcoming, we propose in this work a benchmark suite, OptimSuite, which covers a broad range of black-box optimization problems, ranging from academic benchmarks to real-world applications, from discrete over numerical to mixed-integer problems, from small to very large-scale problems, from noisy over dynamic to static problems, etc. We demonstrate the advantages of such a broad collection by deriving from it Automated Black Box Optimizer (ABBO), a general-purpose algorithm selection wizard. Using three different types of algorithm selection techniques, ABBO achieves competitive performance on all benchmark suites. It significantly outperforms previous state of the art on some of them, including YABBOB and LSGO. ABBO relies on many high-quality base components. Its excellent performance is obtained without any task-specific parametrization. The OptimSuite benchmark collection, the ABBO wizard and its base solvers have all been merged into the open-source Nevergrad platform, where they are available for reproducible research.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: