Strategy for Boosting Pair Comparison and Improving Quality Assessment Accuracy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The development of rigorous quality assessment model relies on the collection of reliable subjective data, where the perceived quality of visual multimedia is rated by the human observers. Different subjective assessment protocols can be used according to the objectives, which determine the discriminability and accuracy of the subjective data. Single stimulus methodology, e.g., the Absolute Category Rating (ACR) has been widely adopted due to its simplicity and efficiency. However, Pair Comparison (PC) is of significant advantage over ACR in terms of discriminability. In addition, PC avoids the influence of observers' bias regarding their understanding of the quality scale. Nevertheless, full pair comparison is much more time-consuming. In this study, we therefore 1) employ a generic model to bridge the pair comparison data and ACR data, where the variance term could be recovered and the obtained information is more complete; 2) propose a fusion strategy to boost pair comparisons by utilizing the ACR results as initialization information; 3) develop a novel active batch sampling strategy based on Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) for PC. In such a way, the proposed methodology could achieve the same accuracy of pair comparison but with the compelxity as low as ACR. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed approach, which outperforms the state of the art approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Mobile Gaming Videocited by 8
- 2024Active Preference Learning for Ordering Items In- and Out-of-samplecited by 6
- 2021Considering user agreement in learning to predict the aesthetic qualitycited by 0
- 2022Improving Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling method to measure inter content scalecited by 0
- 2026Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation3 Jul 2026
- 2024Active Preference Learning for Ordering Items In- and Out-of-sample5 May 2024
- 2022Improving Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling method to measure inter content scale25 Feb 2022
- 2021Considering user agreement in learning to predict the aesthetic quality13 Oct 2021
- 2021Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Mobile Gaming Video27 Jan 2021