User-item matching for recommendation fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As we all know, users and item-providers are two main parties of participants in recommender systems. However, most existing research efforts on recommendation were focused on better serving users and overlooked the purpose of item-providers. This paper is devoted to improve the item exposure fairness for item-providers' objective, and keep the recommendation accuracy not decreased or even improved for users' objective. We propose to set stock volume constraints on items, to be specific, limit the maximally allowable recommended times of an item to be proportional to the frequency of its being interacted in the past, which is validated to achieve superior item exposure fairness to common recommenders and thus mitigates the Matthew Effect on item popularity. With the two constraints of pre-existing recommendation length of users and our stock volumes of items, a heuristic strategy based on normalized scores and a Minimum Cost Maximum Flow (MCMF) based model are proposed to solve the optimal user-item matching problem, whose accuracy performances are even better than that of baseline algorithm in regular recommendation context, and in line with state-of-the-art enhancement of the baseline. What's more, our MCMF based strategy is parameter-free, while those counterpart algorithms have to resort to parameter traversal process to achieve their best performance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directionscited by 30
- 2024Understanding Biases in ChatGPT-based Recommender Systems: Provider Fairness, Temporal Stability, and Recencycited by 28
- 2022Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applicationscited by 27
- 2022Diversely Regularized Matrix Factorization for Accurate and Aggregately Diversified Recommendationcited by 2
- 2024Understanding Biases in ChatGPT-based Recommender Systems: Provider Fairness, Temporal Stability, and Recency19 Jan 2024
- 2022Diversely Regularized Matrix Factorization for Accurate and Aggregately Diversified Recommendation19 Oct 2022
- 2022Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applications26 May 2022
- 2022Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions23 May 2022