Adaptive Label Smoothing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper concerns the use of objectness measures to improve the calibration performance of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). CNNs have proven to be very good classifiers and generally localize objects well; however, the loss functions typically used to train classification CNNs do not penalize inability to localize an object, nor do they take into account an object's relative size in the given image. During training on ImageNet-1K almost all approaches use random crops on the images and this transformation sometimes provides the CNN with background only samples. This causes the classifiers to depend on context. Context dependence is harmful for safety-critical applications. We present a novel approach to classification that combines the ideas of objectness and label smoothing during training. Unlike previous methods, we compute a smoothing factor that is adaptive based on relative object size within an image. This causes our approach to produce confidences that are grounded in the size of the object being classified instead of relying on context to make the correct predictions. We present extensive results using ImageNet to demonstrate that CNNs trained using adaptive label smoothing are much less likely to be overconfident in their predictions. We show qualitative results using class activation maps and quantitative results using classification and transfer learning tasks. Our approach is able to produce an order of magnitude reduction in confidence when predicting on context only images when compared to baselines. Using transfer learning, we gain 2.1mAP on MS COCO compared to the hard label approach.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Is one annotation enough? A data-centric image classification benchmark for noisy and ambiguous label estimationcited by 43
- 2022Adaptive Label Smoothing with Self-Knowledge in Natural Language Generationcited by 9
- 2023MAFA: Managing False Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-trainingcited by 9
- 2023Diversifying Question Generation over Knowledge Base via External Natural Questionscited by 6
- 2024Adaptive Label Smoothing for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Few-Shot Learning in Video and 3D Object Detection: A Surveycited by 2
- 2023Annotating Ambiguous Images: General Annotation Strategy for High-Quality Data with Real-World Biomedical Validationcited by 1
- 2024Regularizing CNNs using Confusion Penalty Based Label Smoothing for Histopathology Imagescited by 1
- 2021WHOSe Heritage: Classification of UNESCO World Heritage "Outstanding Universal Value" Documents with Soft Labelscited by 0
- 2025Few-Shot Learning in Video and 3D Object Detection: A Survey22 Jul 2025
- 2024Adaptive Label Smoothing for Out-of-Distribution Detection8 Oct 2024
- 2024Regularizing CNNs using Confusion Penalty Based Label Smoothing for Histopathology Images16 Mar 2024
- 2023MAFA: Managing False Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-training11 Dec 2023
- 2023Diversifying Question Generation over Knowledge Base via External Natural Questions23 Sep 2023
- 2023Annotating Ambiguous Images: General Annotation Strategy for High-Quality Data with Real-World Biomedical Validation21 Jun 2023
- 2022Adaptive Label Smoothing with Self-Knowledge in Natural Language Generation22 Oct 2022
- 2022Is one annotation enough? A data-centric image classification benchmark for noisy and ambiguous label estimation13 Jul 2022
- 2021WHOSe Heritage: Classification of UNESCO World Heritage "Outstanding Universal Value" Documents with Soft Labels12 Apr 2021