Play MNIST For Me! User Studies on the Effects of Post-Hoc, Example-Based Explanations & Error Rates on Debugging a Deep Learning, Black-Box Classifier
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper reports two experiments (N=349) on the impact of post hoc explanations by example and error rates on peoples perceptions of a black box classifier. Both experiments show that when people are given case based explanations, from an implemented ANN CBR twin system, they perceive miss classifications to be more correct. They also show that as error rates increase above 4%, people trust the classifier less and view it as being less correct, less reasonable and less trustworthy. The implications of these results for XAI are discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Robust and Explainable Identification of Logical Fallacies in Natural Language Argumentscited by 12
- 2023Case-Based Reasoning with Language Models for Classification of Logical Fallaciescited by 8
- 2022Multimodal and Explainable Internet Meme Classificationcited by 5
- 2024Cultural Bias in Explainable AI Research: A Systematic Analysiscited by 3
- 2024Cultural Bias in Explainable AI Research: A Systematic Analysis28 Feb 2024
- 2023Case-Based Reasoning with Language Models for Classification of Logical Fallacies27 Jan 2023
- 2022Robust and Explainable Identification of Logical Fallacies in Natural Language Arguments12 Dec 2022
- 2022Multimodal and Explainable Internet Meme Classification11 Dec 2022