mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting Training Time Without Training

arXiv 2008.12478 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We tackle the problem of predicting the number of optimization steps that a pre-trained deep network needs to converge to a given value of the loss function. To do so, we leverage the fact that the training dynamics of a deep network during fine-tuning are well approximated by those of a linearized model. This allows us to approximate the training loss and accuracy at any point during training by solving a low-dimensional Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE) in function space. Using this result, we are able to predict the time it takes for Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) to fine-tune a model to a given loss without having to perform any training. In our experiments, we are able to predict training time of a ResNet within a 20% error margin on a variety of datasets and hyper-parameters, at a 30 to 45-fold reduction in cost compared to actual training. We also discuss how to further reduce the computational and memory cost of our method, and in particular we show that by exploiting the spectral properties of the gradients' matrix it is possible predict training time on a large dataset while processing only a subset of the samples.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 7; 2025: 2.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 218
  2. 2021What can linearized neural networks actually say about generalization?cited by 49
  3. 2021A linearized framework and a new benchmark for model selection for fine-tuningcited by 41
  4. 2021Scaling Neural Tangent Kernels via Sketching and Random Featurescited by 32
  5. 2022TCT: Convexifying Federated Learning using Bootstrapped Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 26
  6. 2024Diffusion Soup: Model Merging for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 25
  7. 2022Demystifying the Neural Tangent Kernel from a Practical Perspective: Can it be trusted for Neural Architecture Search without training?cited by 18
  8. 2021Estimating informativeness of samples with Smooth Unique Informationcited by 15
  9. 2023Understanding Reconstruction Attacks with the Neural Tangent Kernel and Dataset Distillationcited by 14
  10. 2024Neural Lineagecited by 9
  11. 2022Benchmarking Resource Usage for Efficient Distributed Deep Learningcited by 7
  12. 2021Random Features for the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 6
10 more
  1. 2025Efficient Fine-Grained GPU Performance Modeling for Distributed Deep Learning of LLMcited by 4
  2. 2022Cold Posteriors through PAC-Bayescited by 3
  3. 2023The fine print on tempered posteriorscited by 3
  4. 2024Predicting the Encoding Error of SIRENscited by 2
  5. 2025Toward a Holistic Approach to Continual Model Mergingcited by 2
  6. 2022The Underlying Correlated Dynamics in Neural Trainingcited by 1
  7. 2024PreNeT: Leveraging Computational Features to Predict Deep Neural Network Training Timecited by 1
  8. 2024Off-the-Shelf Neural Network Architectures for Forex Time Series Prediction come at a Costcited by 0
  9. 2024UnifiedNN: Efficient Neural Network Training on the Cloudcited by 0
  10. 2024DecTrain: Deciding When to Train a Monocular Depth DNN Onlinecited by 0