mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting Visual Overlap of Images Through Interpretable Non-Metric Box Embeddings

arXiv 2008.05785 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2020cs.CV cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To what extent are two images picturing the same 3D surfaces? Even when this is a known scene, the answer typically requires an expensive search across scale space, with matching and geometric verification of large sets of local features. This expense is further multiplied when a query image is evaluated against a gallery, e.g. in visual relocalization. While we don't obviate the need for geometric verification, we propose an interpretable image-embedding that cuts the search in scale space to essentially a lookup. Our approach measures the asymmetric relation between two images. The model then learns a scene-specific measure of similarity, from training examples with known 3D visible-surface overlaps. The result is that we can quickly identify, for example, which test image is a close-up version of another, and by what scale factor. Subsequently, local features need only be detected at that scale. We validate our scene-specific model by showing how this embedding yields competitive image-matching results, while being simpler, faster, and also interpretable by humans.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 5.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: