Hardware-Centric AutoML for Mixed-Precision Quantization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model quantization is a widely used technique to compress and accelerate deep neural network (DNN) inference. Emergent DNN hardware accelerators begin to support mixed precision (1-8 bits) to further improve the computation efficiency, which raises a great challenge to find the optimal bitwidth for each layer: it requires domain experts to explore the vast design space trading off among accuracy, latency, energy, and model size, which is both time-consuming and sub-optimal. Conventional quantization algorithm ignores the different hardware architectures and quantizes all the layers in a uniform way. In this paper, we introduce the Hardware-Aware Automated Quantization (HAQ) framework which leverages the reinforcement learning to automatically determine the quantization policy, and we take the hardware accelerator's feedback in the design loop. Rather than relying on proxy signals such as FLOPs and model size, we employ a hardware simulator to generate direct feedback signals (latency and energy) to the RL agent. Compared with conventional methods, our framework is fully automated and can specialize the quantization policy for different neural network architectures and hardware architectures. Our framework effectively reduced the latency by 1.4-1.95x and the energy consumption by 1.9x with negligible loss of accuracy compared with the fixed bitwidth (8 bits) quantization. Our framework reveals that the optimal policies on different hardware architectures (i.e., edge and cloud architectures) under different resource constraints (i.e., latency, energy, and model size) are drastically different. We interpreted the implication of different quantization policies, which offer insights for both neural network architecture design and hardware architecture design.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023SparseViT: Revisiting Activation Sparsity for Efficient High-Resolution Vision Transformercited by 60
- 2022Enable Deep Learning on Mobile Devices: Methods, Systems, and Applicationscited by 32
- 2022PVNAS: 3D Neural Architecture Search with Point-Voxel Convolutioncited by 16
- 2021Finding the Task-Optimal Low-Bit Sub-Distribution in Deep Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2024HGQ: High Granularity Quantization for Real-time Neural Networks on FPGAscited by 9
- 2022FxP-QNet: A Post-Training Quantizer for the Design of Mixed Low-Precision DNNs with Dynamic Fixed-Point Representationcited by 2
- 2022Design Automation for Fast, Lightweight, and Effective Deep Learning Models: A Surveycited by 1
- 2025PROM: Prioritize Reduction of Multiplications Over Lower Bit-Widths for Efficient CNNscited by 1
- 2025PROM: Prioritize Reduction of Multiplications Over Lower Bit-Widths for Efficient CNNs6 May 2025
- 2024HGQ: High Granularity Quantization for Real-time Neural Networks on FPGAs1 May 2024
- 2023SparseViT: Revisiting Activation Sparsity for Efficient High-Resolution Vision Transformer30 Mar 2023
- 2022Design Automation for Fast, Lightweight, and Effective Deep Learning Models: A Survey22 Aug 2022
- 2022PVNAS: 3D Neural Architecture Search with Point-Voxel Convolution25 Apr 2022
- 2022Enable Deep Learning on Mobile Devices: Methods, Systems, and Applications25 Apr 2022
- 2022FxP-QNet: A Post-Training Quantizer for the Design of Mixed Low-Precision DNNs with Dynamic Fixed-Point Representation22 Mar 2022
- 2021Finding the Task-Optimal Low-Bit Sub-Distribution in Deep Neural Networks30 Dec 2021