AI Failures: A Review of Underlying Issues
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Instances of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems failing to deliver consistent, satisfactory performance are legion. We investigate why AI failures occur. We address only a narrow subset of the broader field of AI Safety. We focus on AI failures on account of flaws in conceptualization, design and deployment. Other AI Safety issues like trade-offs between privacy and security or convenience, bad actors hacking into AI systems to create mayhem or bad actors deploying AI for purposes harmful to humanity and are out of scope of our discussion. We find that AI systems fail on account of omission and commission errors in the design of the AI system, as well as upon failure to develop an appropriate interpretation of input information. Moreover, even when there is no significant flaw in the AI software, an AI system may fail because the hardware is incapable of robust performance across environments. Finally an AI system is quite likely to fail in situations where, in effect, it is called upon to deliver moral judgments -- a capability AI does not possess. We observe certain trade-offs in measures to mitigate a subset of AI failures and provide some recommendations.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021High-dimensional separability for one- and few-shot learningcited by 11
- 2022A taxonomic system for failure cause analysis of open source AI incidentscited by 9
- 2023Between accurate prediction and poor decision making: the AI/ML gapcited by 1
- 2025Beyond Explainability: The Case for AI Validationcited by 1
- 2025Mitigating Harmful Erraticism in LLMs Through Dialectical Behavior Therapy Based De-Escalation Strategiescited by 0
- 2026Resilience Meets Autonomy: Governing Embodied AI in Critical Infrastructurecited by 0
- 2026Resilience Meets Autonomy: Governing Embodied AI in Critical Infrastructure16 Mar 2026
- 2025Mitigating Harmful Erraticism in LLMs Through Dialectical Behavior Therapy Based De-Escalation Strategies6 Sep 2025
- 2025Beyond Explainability: The Case for AI Validation27 May 2025
- 2023Between accurate prediction and poor decision making: the AI/ML gap3 Oct 2023
- 2022A taxonomic system for failure cause analysis of open source AI incidents14 Nov 2022
- 2021High-dimensional separability for one- and few-shot learning28 Jun 2021