Foundations of Reasoning with Uncertainty via Real-valued Logics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-valued logics underlie an increasing number of neuro-symbolic approaches, though typically their logical inference capabilities are characterized only qualitatively. We provide foundations for establishing the correctness and power of such systems. We give a sound and strongly complete axiomatization that can be parametrized to cover essentially every real-valued logic, including all the common fuzzy logics. Our class of sentences are very rich, and each describes a set of possible real values for a collection of formulas of the real-valued logic, including which combinations of real values are possible. Strong completeness allows us to derive exactly what information can be inferred about the combinations of real values of a collection of formulas given information about the combinations of real values of several other collections of formulas. We then extend the axiomatization to deal with weighted subformulas. Finally, we give a decision procedure based on linear programming for deciding, for certain real-valued logics and under certain natural assumptions, whether a set of our sentences logically implies another of our sentences.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.
2 papers.