Describing Textures using Natural Language
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Textures in natural images can be characterized by color, shape, periodicity of elements within them, and other attributes that can be described using natural language. In this paper, we study the problem of describing visual attributes of texture on a novel dataset containing rich descriptions of textures, and conduct a systematic study of current generative and discriminative models for grounding language to images on this dataset. We find that while these models capture some properties of texture, they fail to capture several compositional properties, such as the colors of dots. We provide critical analysis of existing models by generating synthetic but realistic textures with different descriptions. Our dataset also allows us to train interpretable models and generate language-based explanations of what discriminative features are learned by deep networks for fine-grained categorization where texture plays a key role. We present visualizations of several fine-grained domains and show that texture attributes learned on our dataset offer improvements over expert-designed attributes on the Caltech-UCSD Birds dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2.
5 papers.
- 2021Language-Driven Image Style Transfercited by 36
- 2022Learning Visual Styles from Audio-Visual Associationscited by 22
- 2022How well does CLIP understand texture?cited by 7
- 2023The Visual Language of Fabricscited by 7
- 2023Generating Parametric BRDFs from Natural Language Descriptionscited by 3
- 2023The Visual Language of Fabrics25 Jul 2023
- 2023Generating Parametric BRDFs from Natural Language Descriptions19 Jun 2023
- 2022Learning Visual Styles from Audio-Visual Associations10 May 2022
- 2022How well does CLIP understand texture?22 Mar 2022
- 2021Language-Driven Image Style Transfer1 Jun 2021