mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Consistent Transcription and Translation of Speech

arXiv 2007.12741 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2020cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The conventional paradigm in speech translation starts with a speech recognition step to generate transcripts, followed by a translation step with the automatic transcripts as input. To address various shortcomings of this paradigm, recent work explores end-to-end trainable direct models that translate without transcribing. However, transcripts can be an indispensable output in practical applications, which often display transcripts alongside the translations to users. We make this common requirement explicit and explore the task of jointly transcribing and translating speech. While high accuracy of transcript and translation are crucial, even highly accurate systems can suffer from inconsistencies between both outputs that degrade the user experience. We introduce a methodology to evaluate consistency and compare several modeling approaches, including the traditional cascaded approach and end-to-end models. We find that direct models are poorly suited to the joint transcription/translation task, but that end-to-end models that feature a coupled inference procedure are able to achieve strong consistency. We further introduce simple techniques for directly optimizing for consistency, and analyze the resulting trade-offs between consistency, transcription accuracy, and translation accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 7; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: