How to Democratise and Protect AI: Fair and Differentially Private Decentralised Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper firstly considers the research problem of fairness in collaborative deep learning, while ensuring privacy. A novel reputation system is proposed through digital tokens and local credibility to ensure fairness, in combination with differential privacy to guarantee privacy. In particular, we build a fair and differentially private decentralised deep learning framework called FDPDDL, which enables parties to derive more accurate local models in a fair and private manner by using our developed two-stage scheme: during the initialisation stage, artificial samples generated by Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Network (DPGAN) are used to mutually benchmark the local credibility of each party and generate initial tokens; during the update stage, Differentially Private SGD (DPSGD) is used to facilitate collaborative privacy-preserving deep learning, and local credibility and tokens of each party are updated according to the quality and quantity of individually released gradients. Experimental results on benchmark datasets under three realistic settings demonstrate that FDPDDL achieves high fairness, yields comparable accuracy to the centralised and distributed frameworks, and delivers better accuracy than the standalone framework.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2023When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motivations, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 83
- 2022A Survey on Federated Recommendation Systemscited by 25
- 2024Towards Efficient Communication and Secure Federated Recommendation System via Low-rank Trainingcited by 14
- 2022The Impact of Differential Privacy on Group Disparity Mitigationcited by 11
- 2024Incentives in Private Collaborative Machine Learningcited by 10
- 2022BEAS: Blockchain Enabled Asynchronous & Secure Federated Machine Learningcited by 7
- 2022Federated and Transfer Learning: A Survey on Adversaries and Defense Mechanismscited by 4
- 2024FedSAC: Dynamic Submodel Allocation for Collaborative Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 4
- 2023Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning: Examining Current Approachescited by 3
- 2024Bounding the Excess Risk for Linear Models Trained on Marginal-Preserving, Differentially-Private, Synthetic Datacited by 3
- 2024Data Quality in Edge Machine Learning: A State-of-the-Art Surveycited by 0
- 2025ATR-Bench: A Federated Learning Benchmark for Adaptation, Trust, and Reasoningcited by 0
- 2025ATR-Bench: A Federated Learning Benchmark for Adaptation, Trust, and Reasoning22 May 2025
- 2024Data Quality in Edge Machine Learning: A State-of-the-Art Survey1 Jun 2024
- 2024FedSAC: Dynamic Submodel Allocation for Collaborative Fairness in Federated Learning28 May 2024
- 2024Incentives in Private Collaborative Machine Learning2 Apr 2024
- 2024Bounding the Excess Risk for Linear Models Trained on Marginal-Preserving, Differentially-Private, Synthetic Data6 Feb 2024
- 2024Towards Efficient Communication and Secure Federated Recommendation System via Low-rank Training8 Jan 2024
- 2023Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning: Examining Current Approaches16 Nov 2023
- 2023When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motivations, Challenges, and Future Directions27 Jun 2023
- 2022A Survey on Federated Recommendation Systems27 Dec 2022
- 2022Federated and Transfer Learning: A Survey on Adversaries and Defense Mechanisms5 Jul 2022
- 2022The Impact of Differential Privacy on Group Disparity Mitigation5 Mar 2022
- 2022BEAS: Blockchain Enabled Asynchronous & Secure Federated Machine Learning6 Feb 2022