Adversarial robustness via robust low rank representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial robustness measures the susceptibility of a classifier to imperceptible perturbations made to the inputs at test time. In this work we highlight the benefits of natural low rank representations that often exist for real data such as images, for training neural networks with certified robustness guarantees. Our first contribution is for certified robustness to perturbations measured in ℓ2 norm. We exploit low rank data representations to provide improved guarantees over state-of-the-art randomized smoothing-based approaches on standard benchmark datasets such as CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. Our second contribution is for the more challenging setting of certified robustness to perturbations measured in ℓ_∞ norm. We demonstrate empirically that natural low rank representations have inherent robustness properties, that can be leveraged to provide significantly better guarantees for certified robustness to ℓ_∞ perturbations in those representations. Our certificate of ℓ_∞ robustness relies on a natural quantity involving the ∞ → 2 matrix operator norm associated with the representation, to translate robustness guarantees from ℓ2 to ℓ_∞ perturbations. A key technical ingredient for our certification guarantees is a fast algorithm with provable guarantees based on the multiplicative weights update method to provide upper bounds on the above matrix norm. Our algorithmic guarantees improve upon the state of the art for this problem, and may be of independent interest.
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
14 papers.
Sort:
- 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
- 2021SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statisticscited by 123
- 2022Double Sampling Randomized Smoothingcited by 22
- 2021Input-Specific Robustness Certification for Randomized Smoothingcited by 11
- 2022Adversarial robustness of sparse local Lipschitz predictorscited by 11
- 2023Adversarial Examples Might be Avoidable: The Role of Data Concentration in Adversarial Robustnesscited by 11
- 2023It Is All About Data: A Survey on the Effects of Data on Adversarial Robustnesscited by 9
- 2024On Fairness of Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Modelscited by 8
- 2023Understanding Noise-Augmented Training for Randomized Smoothingcited by 7
- 2021Adversarial for Good? How the Adversarial ML Community's Values Impede Socially Beneficial Uses of Attackscited by 5
- 2024Accelerated Smoothing: A Scalable Approach to Randomized Smoothingcited by 1
- 2024Average Certified Radius is a Poor Metric for Randomized Smoothingcited by 1
- 2026Low Rank Adaptation for Adversarial Perturbation30 Apr 2026
- 2025Beyond topography: Topographic regularization improves robustness and reshapes representations in convolutional neural networks31 Jul 2025
- 2024Average Certified Radius is a Poor Metric for Randomized Smoothing9 Oct 2024
- 2024On Fairness of Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Models27 May 2024
- 2024Accelerated Smoothing: A Scalable Approach to Randomized Smoothing12 Feb 2024
- 2023Adversarial Examples Might be Avoidable: The Role of Data Concentration in Adversarial Robustness28 Sep 2023
- 2023Understanding Noise-Augmented Training for Randomized Smoothing8 May 2023
- 2023It Is All About Data: A Survey on the Effects of Data on Adversarial Robustness17 Mar 2023
- 2022Double Sampling Randomized Smoothing16 Jun 2022
- 2022Adversarial robustness of sparse local Lipschitz predictors26 Feb 2022
- 2021Input-Specific Robustness Certification for Randomized Smoothing21 Dec 2021
- 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A survey1 Aug 2021
- 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
- 2021SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statisticscited by 123
- 2022Double Sampling Randomized Smoothingcited by 22
- 2021Input-Specific Robustness Certification for Randomized Smoothingcited by 11
- 2022Adversarial robustness of sparse local Lipschitz predictorscited by 11
- 2023Adversarial Examples Might be Avoidable: The Role of Data Concentration in Adversarial Robustnesscited by 11
- 2023It Is All About Data: A Survey on the Effects of Data on Adversarial Robustnesscited by 9
- 2024On Fairness of Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Modelscited by 8
- 2023Understanding Noise-Augmented Training for Randomized Smoothingcited by 7
- 2021Adversarial for Good? How the Adversarial ML Community's Values Impede Socially Beneficial Uses of Attackscited by 5
- 2024Accelerated Smoothing: A Scalable Approach to Randomized Smoothingcited by 1
- 2024Average Certified Radius is a Poor Metric for Randomized Smoothingcited by 1
12 most cited of 14 All 14 (JSON)
- 2026Low Rank Adaptation for Adversarial Perturbation30 Apr 2026
- 2025Beyond topography: Topographic regularization improves robustness and reshapes representations in convolutional neural networks31 Jul 2025
- 2024Average Certified Radius is a Poor Metric for Randomized Smoothing9 Oct 2024
- 2024On Fairness of Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Models27 May 2024
- 2024Accelerated Smoothing: A Scalable Approach to Randomized Smoothing12 Feb 2024
- 2023Adversarial Examples Might be Avoidable: The Role of Data Concentration in Adversarial Robustness28 Sep 2023
- 2023Understanding Noise-Augmented Training for Randomized Smoothing8 May 2023
- 2023It Is All About Data: A Survey on the Effects of Data on Adversarial Robustness17 Mar 2023
- 2022Double Sampling Randomized Smoothing16 Jun 2022
- 2022Adversarial robustness of sparse local Lipschitz predictors26 Feb 2022
- 2021Input-Specific Robustness Certification for Randomized Smoothing21 Dec 2021
- 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A survey1 Aug 2021
12 newest of 14 All 14 (JSON)