mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reformulation of the No-Free-Lunch Theorem for Entangled Data Sets

arXiv 2007.04900 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2020quant-ph cs.LGcited by 28

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The no-free-lunch (NFL) theorem is a celebrated result in learning theory that limits one's ability to learn a function with a training data set. With the recent rise of quantum machine learning, it is natural to ask whether there is a quantum analog of the NFL theorem, which would restrict a quantum computer's ability to learn a unitary process (the quantum analog of a function) with quantum training data. However, in the quantum setting, the training data can possess entanglement, a strong correlation with no classical analog. In this work, we show that entangled data sets lead to an apparent violation of the (classical) NFL theorem. This motivates a reformulation that accounts for the degree of entanglement in the training set. As our main result, we prove a quantum NFL theorem whereby the fundamental limit on the learnability of a unitary is reduced by entanglement. We employ Rigetti's quantum computer to test both the classical and quantum NFL theorems. Our work establishes that entanglement is a commodity in quantum machine learning.

Key facts. Cited by 28 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 8; 2023: 7; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

28 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 214
  2. 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 202
  3. 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
  4. 2021Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learningcited by 95
  5. 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 89
  6. 2022Out-of-distribution generalization for learning quantum dynamicscited by 49
  7. 2022Representation Theory for Geometric Quantum Machine Learningcited by 40
  8. 2021Recent advances for quantum classifierscited by 35
  9. 2021Entangled Datasets for Quantum Machine Learningcited by 26
  10. 2021Universal Adversarial Examples and Perturbations for Quantum Classifierscited by 22
  11. 2022Analytic theory for the dynamics of wide quantum neural networkscited by 21
  12. 2021Variational inference with a quantum computercited by 18
16 more
  1. 2022Dynamical simulation via quantum machine learning with provable generalizationcited by 15
  2. 2021Impossibility Results in AI: A Surveycited by 13
  3. 2023The power and limitations of learning quantum dynamics incoherentlycited by 12
  4. 2023Generalization of Quantum Machine Learning Models Using Quantum Fisher Information Metriccited by 10
  5. 2022Overfitting in quantum machine learning and entangling dropoutcited by 9
  6. 2025A Primer on Quantum Machine Learningcited by 9
  7. 2021Long-time simulations with high fidelity on quantum hardwarecited by 8
  8. 2022Variational Quantum Approximate Support Vector Machine with Inference Transfercited by 7
  9. 2023Expressibility-induced Concentration of Quantum Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 7
  10. 2022Optimal quantum dataset for learning a unitary transformationcited by 6
  11. 2023Transition Role of Entangled Data in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 5
  12. 2023Architectural Vision for Quantum Computing in the Edge-Cloud Continuumcited by 2
  13. 2023Topological Learning in Multi-Class Data Setscited by 0
  14. 2024Noise-tolerant learnability of shallow quantum circuits from statistics and the cost of quantum pseudorandomnesscited by 0
  15. 2026Eliminating Vendor Lock-In in Quantum Machine Learning via Framework-Agnostic Neural Networkscited by 0
  16. 2026Statistical Mechanics of Learning on Product Wasserstein Manifoldscited by 0