mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards a practical measure of interference for reinforcement learning

arXiv 2007.03807 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2020cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Catastrophic interference is common in many network-based learning systems, and many proposals exist for mitigating it. But, before we overcome interference we must understand it better. In this work, we provide a definition of interference for control in reinforcement learning. We systematically evaluate our new measures, by assessing correlation with several measures of learning performance, including stability, sample efficiency, and online and offline control performance across a variety of learning architectures. Our new interference measure allows us to ask novel scientific questions about commonly used deep learning architectures. In particular we show that target network frequency is a dominating factor for interference, and that updates on the last layer result in significantly higher interference than updates internal to the network. This new measure can be expensive to compute; we conclude with motivation for an efficient proxy measure and empirically demonstrate it is correlated with our definition of interference.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.