mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Continual Learning in Human Activity Recognition: an Empirical Analysis of Regularization

arXiv 2007.03032 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2020cs.LG cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given the growing trend of continual learning techniques for deep neural networks focusing on the domain of computer vision, there is a need to identify which of these generalizes well to other tasks such as human activity recognition (HAR). As recent methods have mostly been composed of loss regularization terms and memory replay, we provide a constituent-wise analysis of some prominent task-incremental learning techniques employing these on HAR datasets. We find that most regularization approaches lack substantial effect and provide an intuition of when they fail. Thus, we make the case that the development of continual learning algorithms should be motivated by rather diverse task domains.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

7 papers.