Hedging using reinforcement learning: Contextual k-Armed Bandit versus Q-learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The construction of replication strategies for contingent claims in the presence of risk and market friction is a key problem of financial engineering. In real markets, continuous replication, such as in the model of Black, Scholes and Merton (BSM), is not only unrealistic but it is also undesirable due to high transaction costs. A variety of methods have been proposed to balance between effective replication and losses in the incomplete market setting. With the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI-based hedgers have attracted considerable interest, where particular attention was given to Recurrent Neural Network systems and variations of the Q-learning algorithm. From a practical point of view, sufficient samples for training such an AI can only be obtained from a simulator of the market environment. Yet if an agent was trained solely on simulated data, the run-time performance will primarily reflect the accuracy of the simulation, which leads to the classical problem of model choice and calibration. In this article, the hedging problem is viewed as an instance of a risk-averse contextual k-armed bandit problem, which is motivated by the simplicity and sample-efficiency of the architecture. This allows for realistic online model updates from real-world data. We find that the k-armed bandit model naturally fits to the Profit and Loss formulation of hedging, providing for a more accurate and sample efficient approach than Q-learning and reducing to the Black-Scholes model in the absence of transaction costs and risks.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 5.
7 papers.
- 2021Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning in Financecited by 102
- 2025Real-Time Black-Box Optimization for Dynamic Discrete Environments Using Embedded Ising Machinescited by 2
- 2025Right Place, Right Time: Market Simulation-based RL for Execution Optimisationcited by 2
- 2024ε-Neural Thompson Sampling of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease Treatmentcited by 1
- 2025Deep Hedging Under Non-Convexity: Limitations and a Case for AlphaZerocited by 1
- 2025Locally Private Nonparametric Contextual Multi-armed Banditscited by 0
- 2025Adaptive Approach to Enhance Machine Learning Scheduling Algorithms During Runtime Using Reinforcement Learning in Metascheduling Applicationscited by 0
- 2025Right Place, Right Time: Market Simulation-based RL for Execution Optimisation25 Oct 2025
- 2025Deep Hedging Under Non-Convexity: Limitations and a Case for AlphaZero2 Oct 2025
- 2025Adaptive Approach to Enhance Machine Learning Scheduling Algorithms During Runtime Using Reinforcement Learning in Metascheduling Applications24 Sep 2025
- 2025Real-Time Black-Box Optimization for Dynamic Discrete Environments Using Embedded Ising Machines20 Jun 2025
- 2025Locally Private Nonparametric Contextual Multi-armed Bandits11 Mar 2025
- 2024ε-Neural Thompson Sampling of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease Treatment11 Mar 2024
- 2021Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning in Finance8 Dec 2021