On Saliency Maps and Adversarial Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A Very recent trend has emerged to couple the notion of interpretability and adversarial robustness, unlike earlier efforts which solely focused on good interpretations or robustness against adversaries. Works have shown that adversarially trained models exhibit more interpretable saliency maps than their non-robust counterparts, and that this behavior can be quantified by considering the alignment between input image and saliency map. In this work, we provide a different perspective to this coupling, and provide a method, Saliency based Adversarial training (SAT), to use saliency maps to improve adversarial robustness of a model. In particular, we show that using annotations such as bounding boxes and segmentation masks, already provided with a dataset, as weak saliency maps, suffices to improve adversarial robustness with no additional effort to generate the perturbations themselves. Our empirical results on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Tiny ImageNet and Flower-17 datasets consistently corroborate our claim, by showing improved adversarial robustness using our method. saliency maps. We also show how using finer and stronger saliency maps leads to more robust models, and how integrating SAT with existing adversarial training methods, further boosts performance of these existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 126
- 2022Understanding and Enhancing Robustness of Concept-based Modelscited by 22
- 2021Fooling Partial Dependence via Data Poisoningcited by 16
- 2023Model-agnostic explainable artificial intelligence for object detection in image datacited by 6
- 2022On the Robustness of Explanations of Deep Neural Network Models: A Surveycited by 5
- 2023SAFE: Saliency-Aware Counterfactual Explanations for DNN-based Automated Driving Systemscited by 5
- 2026Interpretability Can Be Actionablecited by 5
- 2024Interpretability-Guided Test-Time Adversarial Defensecited by 3
- 2021Saliency Diversified Deep Ensemble for Robustness to Adversariescited by 2
- 2025Out-of-the-box: Black-box Causal Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 1
- 2026Improving Adversarial Robustness of Attribution via Implicit Regularizationcited by 0
- 2026Improving Adversarial Robustness of Attribution via Implicit Regularization28 May 2026
- 2026Interpretability Can Be Actionable11 May 2026
- 2025Out-of-the-box: Black-box Causal Attacks on Object Detectors3 Dec 2025
- 2024Interpretability-Guided Test-Time Adversarial Defense23 Sep 2024
- 2023SAFE: Saliency-Aware Counterfactual Explanations for DNN-based Automated Driving Systems28 Jul 2023
- 2023Model-agnostic explainable artificial intelligence for object detection in image data30 Mar 2023
- 2022Understanding and Enhancing Robustness of Concept-based Models29 Nov 2022
- 2022On the Robustness of Explanations of Deep Neural Network Models: A Survey9 Nov 2022
- 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networks27 Jul 2022
- 2021Saliency Diversified Deep Ensemble for Robustness to Adversaries7 Dec 2021
- 2021Fooling Partial Dependence via Data Poisoning26 May 2021