mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Digital twin, physics-based model, and machine learning applied to damage detection in structures

arXiv 2005.14360 ↗First posted 29 May 2020eess.SPcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work is interested in digital twins, and the development of a simplified framework for them, in the context of dynamical systems. Digital twin is an ingenious concept that helps on organizing different areas of expertise aiming at supporting engineering decisions related to a specific asset; it articulates computational models, sensors, learning, real time analysis, diagnosis, prognosis, and so on. In this framework, and to leverage its capacity, we explore the integration of physics-based models with machine learning. A digital twin is constructed for a damaged structure, where a discrete physics-based computational model is employed to investigate several damage scenarios. A machine learning classifier, that serves as the digital twin, is trained with data taken from a stochastic computational model. This strategy allows the use of an interpretable model (physics-based) to build a fast digital twin (machine learning) that will be connected to the physical twin to support real time engineering decisions. Different classifiers (quadratic discriminant, support vector machines, etc) are tested, and different model parameters (number of sensors, level of noise, damage intensity, uncertainty, operational parameters, etc) are considered to construct datasets for the training. The accuracy of the digital twin depends on the scenario analyzed. Through the chosen application, we are able to emphasize each step of a digital twin construction, including the possibility of integrating physics-based models with machine learning. The different scenarios explored yield conclusions that might be helpful for a large range of applications.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022A Comprehensive Review of Digital Twin -- Part 1: Modeling and Twinning Enabling Technologiescited by 28
  2. 2023Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Engineering Design and Health Prognostics: A Tutorialcited by 27
  3. 2022A Review of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Structural Dynamics and Vibroacousticcited by 7
  4. 2023Discussing the Spectrum of Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning; a Survey on Structural Mechanics Applicationscited by 7
  5. 2025Targeted Digital Twin via Flow Map Learning and Its Application to Fluid Dynamicscited by 5
  6. 2021Machine learning based digital twin for stochastic nonlinear multi-degree of freedom dynamical systemcited by 4
  7. 2024State-of-the-Art Review: The Use of Digital Twins to Support Artificial Intelligence-Guided Predictive Maintenancecited by 2
  8. 2025Bridging the Reality Gap in Digital Twins with Context-Aware, Physics-Guided Deep Learningcited by 2
  9. 2021Explainable AI (XAI) for PHM of Industrial Asset: A State-of-The-Art, PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Reviewcited by 1
  10. 2022Virtual twins of nonlinear vibrating multiphysics microstructures: physics-based versus deep learning-based approachescited by 1
  11. 2023Physics-based Reduced Order Modeling for Uncertainty Quantification of Guided Wave Propagation using Bayesian Optimizationcited by 1
  12. 2024Thermodynamics-informed graph neural networks for real-time simulation of digital human twinscited by 1
5 more
  1. 2025Physics-informed Multiple-Input Operators for efficient dynamic response prediction of structurescited by 1
  2. 2025Digital Twin Technologies in Predictive Maintenance: Enabling Transferability via Sim-to-Real and Real-to-Sim Transfercited by 1
  3. 2024Digital Twins and Civil Engineering Phases: Reorienting Adoption Strategiescited by 0
  4. 2026Adaptive Distance-Aware Trunk Deep Operator Learning for Long-Span Roadway Bridgescited by 0
  5. 2026A Synthetic Reliability-Aware PINN Benchmark for Offshore Wind Turbine Support-Structure Monitoring with Bayesian Inverse Identificationcited by 0