mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Try This Instead: Personalized and Interpretable Substitute Recommendation

arXiv 2005.09344 ↗First posted 19 May 2020cs.IRcited by 34

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As a fundamental yet significant process in personalized recommendation, candidate generation and suggestion effectively help users spot the most suitable items for them. Consequently, identifying substitutable items that are interchangeable opens up new opportunities to refine the quality of generated candidates. When a user is browsing a specific type of product (e.g., a laptop) to buy, the accurate recommendation of substitutes (e.g., better equipped laptops) can offer the user more suitable options to choose from, thus substantially increasing the chance of a successful purchase. However, existing methods merely treat this problem as mining pairwise item relationships without the consideration of users' personal preferences. Moreover, the substitutable relationships are implicitly identified through the learned latent representations of items, leading to uninterpretable recommendation results. In this paper, we propose attribute-aware collaborative filtering (A2CF) to perform substitute recommendation by addressing issues from both personalization and interpretability perspectives. Instead of directly modelling user-item interactions, we extract explicit and polarized item attributes from user reviews with sentiment analysis, whereafter the representations of attributes, users, and items are simultaneously learned. Then, by treating attributes as the bridge between users and items, we can thoroughly model the user-item preferences (i.e., personalization) and item-item relationships (i.e., substitution) for recommendation. In addition, A2CF is capable of generating intuitive interpretations by analyzing which attributes a user currently cares the most and comparing the recommended substitutes with her/his currently browsed items at an attribute level. The recommendation effectiveness and interpretation quality of A2CF are demonstrated via extensive experiments on three real datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 34 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 7; 2023: 5; 2024: 8; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

34 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
  2. 2021Counterfactual Explainable Recommendationcited by 60
  3. 2021Contrastive Self-supervised Sequential Recommendation with Robust Augmentationcited by 56
  4. 2021Learning to Ask Appropriate Questions in Conversational Recommendationcited by 35
  5. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systemscited by 32
  6. 2022Measuring "Why" in Recommender Systems: a Comprehensive Survey on the Evaluation of Explainable Recommendationcited by 14
  7. 2024AlignGroup: Learning and Aligning Group Consensus with Member Preferences for Group Recommendationcited by 13
  8. 2023Zero-shot Item-based Recommendation via Multi-task Product Knowledge Graph Pre-Trainingcited by 12
  9. 2021From Intrinsic to Counterfactual: On the Explainability of Contextualized Recommender Systemscited by 9
  10. 2023Semantic-aware Node Synthesis for Imbalanced Heterogeneous Information Networkscited by 9
  11. 2021Comparative Explanations of Recommendationscited by 8
  12. 2024Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware Fairnesscited by 7
22 more
  1. 2024Contrastive Graph Condensation: Advancing Data Versatility through Self-Supervised Learningcited by 6
  2. 2021Quaternion Factorization Machines: A Lightweight Solution to Intricate Feature Interaction Modellingcited by 4
  3. 2021"Are you sure?": Preliminary Insights from Scaling Product Comparisons to Multiple Shopscited by 4
  4. 2022"Does it come in black?" CLIP-like models are zero-shot recommenderscited by 4
  5. 2022A Transformer-Based Substitute Recommendation Model Incorporating Weakly Supervised Customer Behavior Datacited by 4
  6. 2023DREAM: Adaptive Reinforcement Learning based on Attention Mechanism for Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 4
  7. 2023User-Controllable Recommendation via Counterfactual Retrospective and Prospective Explanationscited by 3
  8. 2025AgentDR: Dynamic Recommendation with Implicit Item-Item Relations via LLM-based Agentscited by 3
  9. 2021Attribute-aware Explainable Complementary Clothing Recommendationcited by 2
  10. 2021Personalized On-Device E-health Analytics with Decentralized Block Coordinate Descentcited by 2
  11. 2022Collaborative Reflection-Augmented Autoencoder Network for Recommender Systemscited by 2
  12. 2022Self-supervised Graph-based Point-of-interest Recommendationcited by 2
  13. 2024Enhancing ID-based Recommendation with Large Language Modelscited by 2
  14. 2025Multi-modal Relational Item Representation Learning for Inferring Substitutable and Complementary Itemscited by 2
  15. 2023Explainable Recommender with Geometric Information Bottleneckcited by 0
  16. 2024A Survey of Reasoning for Substitution Relationships: Definitions, Methods, and Directionscited by 0
  17. 2024Stability of Explainable Recommendationcited by 0
  18. 2024Robust Explainable Recommendationcited by 0
  19. 2024An Interpretable Alternative to Neural Representation Learning for Rating Prediction -- Transparent Latent Class Modeling of User Reviewscited by 0
  20. 2025Coarse-to-Fine Lightweight Meta-Embedding for ID-Based Recommendationcited by 0
  21. 2025Comparative Explanations via Counterfactual Reasoning in Recommendationscited by 0
  22. 2026Bi-NAS: Towards Effective and Personalized Explanation for Recommender Systems via Bi-Level Neural Architecture Searchcited by 0