mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Transformer-based Embedding Model for Personalized Product Search

arXiv 2005.08936 ↗First posted 18 May 2020cs.IRcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Product search is an important way for people to browse and purchase items on E-commerce platforms. While customers tend to make choices based on their personal tastes and preferences, analysis of commercial product search logs has shown that personalization does not always improve product search quality. Most existing product search techniques, however, conduct undifferentiated personalization across search sessions. They either use a fixed coefficient to control the influence of personalization or let personalization take effect all the time with an attention mechanism. The only notable exception is the recently proposed zero-attention model (ZAM) that can adaptively adjust the effect of personalization by allowing the query to attend to a zero vector. Nonetheless, in ZAM, personalization can act at most as equally important as the query and the representations of items are static across the collection regardless of the items co-occurring in the user's historical purchases. Aware of these limitations, we propose a transformer-based embedding model (TEM) for personalized product search, which could dynamically control the influence of personalization by encoding the sequence of query and user's purchase history with a transformer architecture. Personalization could have a dominant impact when necessary and interactions between items can be taken into consideration when computing attention weights. Experimental results show that TEM outperforms state-of-the-art personalization product retrieval models significantly.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Recommendation as Instruction Following: A Large Language Model Empowered Recommendation Approachcited by 168
  2. 2024Language Representations Can be What Recommenders Need: Findings and Potentialscited by 18
  3. 2021You Do Not Need a Bigger Boat: Recommendations at Reasonable Scale in a (Mostly) Serverless and Open Stackcited by 5
  4. 2023adSformers: Personalization from Short-Term Sequences and Diversity of Representations in Etsy Adscited by 4
  5. 2023Hierarchically Fusing Long and Short-Term User Interests for Click-Through Rate Prediction in Product Searchcited by 3
  6. 2023Unified Embedding Based Personalized Retrieval in Etsy Searchcited by 3
  7. 2025MAPS: Motivation-Aware Personalized Search via LLM-Driven Consultation Alignmentcited by 3
  8. 2026RLPO: Residual Listwise Preference Optimization for Long-Context Review Rankingcited by 3
  9. 2025SynerGen: Contextualized Generative Recommender for Unified Search and Recommendationcited by 2
  10. 2021Quotient Space-Based Keyword Retrieval in Sponsored Searchcited by 0
  11. 2024Bridging Personalization and Control in Scientific Personalized Searchcited by 0
  12. 2025Multi-Modality Transformer for E-Commerce: Inferring User Purchase Intention to Bridge the Query-Product Gapcited by 0
3 more
  1. 2025IntSR: An Integrated Generative Framework for Search and Recommendationcited by 0
  2. 2025Progressive Refinement of E-commerce Search Ranking Based on Short-Term Activities of the Buyercited by 0
  3. 2026Preference Shapes Relevance: Cross-component Hierarchical Semantic Alignment for Personalized Generative Retrievalcited by 0