Too Many Claims to Fact-Check: Prioritizing Political Claims Based on Check-Worthiness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The massive amount of misinformation spreading on the Internet on a daily basis has enormous negative impacts on societies. Therefore, we need automated systems helping fact-checkers in the combat against misinformation. In this paper, we propose a model prioritizing the claims based on their check-worthiness. We use BERT model with additional features including domain-specific controversial topics, word embeddings, and others. In our experiments, we show that our proposed model outperforms all state-of-the-art models in both test collections of CLEF Check That! Lab in 2018 and 2019. We also conduct a qualitative analysis to shed light-detecting check-worthy claims. We suggest requesting rationales behind judgments are needed to understand subjective nature of the task and problematic labels.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkerscited by 144
- 2024Claim Detection for Automated Fact-checking: A Survey on Monolingual, Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Researchcited by 35
- 2023Human-centered NLP Fact-checking: Co-Designing with Fact-checkers using Matchmaking for AIcited by 9
- 2024Claim Detection for Automated Fact-checking: A Survey on Monolingual, Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Research22 Jan 2024
- 2023Human-centered NLP Fact-checking: Co-Designing with Fact-checkers using Matchmaking for AI14 Aug 2023
- 2021Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkers13 Mar 2021