Improved Price Oracles: Constant Function Market Makers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated market makers, first popularized by Hanson's logarithmic market scoring rule (or LMSR) for prediction markets, have become important building blocks, called 'primitives,' for decentralized finance. A particularly useful primitive is the ability to measure the price of an asset, a problem often known as the pricing oracle problem. In this paper, we focus on the analysis of a very large class of automated market makers, called constant function market makers (or CFMMs) which includes existing popular market makers such as Uniswap, Balancer, and Curve, whose yearly transaction volume totals to billions of dollars. We give sufficient conditions such that, under fairly general assumptions, agents who interact with these constant function market makers are incentivized to correctly report the price of an asset and that they can do so in a computationally efficient way. We also derive several other useful properties that were previously not known. These include lower bounds on the total value of assets held by CFMMs and lower bounds guaranteeing that no agent can, by any set of trades, drain the reserves of assets held by a given CFMM.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
12 papers.
- 2022Explainable AI via Learning to Optimizecited by 14
- 2023Uniswap Liquidity Provision: An Online Learning Approachcited by 5
- 2026AIvilization v0: Toward Large-Scale Artificial Social Simulation with a Unified Agent Architecture and Adaptive Agent Profilescited by 3
- 2021Smart Proofs via Smart Contracts: Succinct and Informative Mathematical Derivations via Decentralized Marketscited by 2
- 2022QLAMMP: A Q-Learning Agent for Optimizing Fees on Automated Market Making Protocolscited by 2
- 2025Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention for Financial Rebalancing: An Empirical Study on Automated Market Makers in Decentralized Financecited by 2
- 2022Predictive Crypto-Asset Automated Market Making Architecture for Decentralized Finance using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Benchmarking Temporal Web3 Intelligence: Lessons from the FinSurvival 2025 Challengecited by 1
- 2025Game of Trust: How Trustworthy Does Your Blockchain Think You Are?cited by 0
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Execution under Dynamic Fees in a Closed-Loop DEX Simulatorcited by 0
- 2026Concentrated Liquidity Provision: a Reinforcement Learning Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026SAiFE-gym: Model-based Environments for Automated Market Making with Concentrated Liquiditycited by 0
- 2026SAiFE-gym: Model-based Environments for Automated Market Making with Concentrated Liquidity15 Sep 2026
- 2026Concentrated Liquidity Provision: a Reinforcement Learning Perspective19 Aug 2026
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Execution under Dynamic Fees in a Closed-Loop DEX Simulator12 Jul 2026
- 2026Benchmarking Temporal Web3 Intelligence: Lessons from the FinSurvival 2025 Challenge26 Feb 2026
- 2026AIvilization v0: Toward Large-Scale Artificial Social Simulation with a Unified Agent Architecture and Adaptive Agent Profiles11 Feb 2026
- 2025Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention for Financial Rebalancing: An Empirical Study on Automated Market Makers in Decentralized Finance21 Sep 2025
- 2025Game of Trust: How Trustworthy Does Your Blockchain Think You Are?20 May 2025
- 2023Uniswap Liquidity Provision: An Online Learning Approach1 Feb 2023
- 2022QLAMMP: A Q-Learning Agent for Optimizing Fees on Automated Market Making Protocols28 Nov 2022
- 2022Predictive Crypto-Asset Automated Market Making Architecture for Decentralized Finance using Deep Reinforcement Learning28 Sep 2022
- 2022Explainable AI via Learning to Optimize29 Apr 2022
- 2021Smart Proofs via Smart Contracts: Succinct and Informative Mathematical Derivations via Decentralized Markets5 Feb 2021