A general theory of identification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
What does it mean to say that a quantity is identifiable from the data? Statisticians seem to agree on a definition in the context of parametric statistical models --- roughly, a parameter θ in a model P = Pθ: θ ∈ Theta is identifiable if the mapping θ mapsto Pθ is injective. This definition raises important questions: Are parameters the only quantities that can be identified? Is the concept of identification meaningful outside of parametric statistics? Does it even require the notion of a statistical model? Partial and idiosyncratic answers to these questions have been discussed in econometrics, biological modeling, and in some subfields of statistics like causal inference. This paper proposes a unifying theory of identification that incorporates existing definitions for parametric and nonparametric models and formalizes the process of identification analysis. The applicability of this framework is illustrated through a series of examples and two extended case studies.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Impossibility Results in AI: A Surveycited by 13
- 2025Statistical Decision Theory with Counterfactual Losscited by 2
- 2026A Fiber Criterion for Representation Identifiability in Supervised Learningcited by 2
- 2024Identifiable Latent Bandits: Leveraging observational data for personalized decision-makingcited by 0
- 2026A Fiber Criterion for Representation Identifiability in Supervised Learning31 May 2026
- 2025Statistical Decision Theory with Counterfactual Loss13 May 2025
- 2024Identifiable Latent Bandits: Leveraging observational data for personalized decision-making23 Jul 2024
- 2021Impossibility Results in AI: A Survey1 Sep 2021