mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A general theory of identification

arXiv 2002.06041 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2020stat.ME math.ST stat.THcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

What does it mean to say that a quantity is identifiable from the data? Statisticians seem to agree on a definition in the context of parametric statistical models --- roughly, a parameter θ in a model P = Pθ: θ ∈ Theta is identifiable if the mapping θ mapsto Pθ is injective. This definition raises important questions: Are parameters the only quantities that can be identified? Is the concept of identification meaningful outside of parametric statistics? Does it even require the notion of a statistical model? Partial and idiosyncratic answers to these questions have been discussed in econometrics, biological modeling, and in some subfields of statistics like causal inference. This paper proposes a unifying theory of identification that incorporates existing definitions for parametric and nonparametric models and formalizes the process of identification analysis. The applicability of this framework is illustrated through a series of examples and two extended case studies.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.