ICDAR 2019 Competition on Image Retrieval for Historical Handwritten Documents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This competition investigates the performance of large-scale retrieval of historical document images based on writing style. Based on large image data sets provided by cultural heritage institutions and digital libraries, providing a total of 20 000 document images representing about 10 000 writers, divided in three types: writers of (i) manuscript books, (ii) letters, (iii) charters and legal documents. We focus on the task of automatic image retrieval to simulate common scenarios of humanities research, such as writer retrieval. The most teams submitted traditional methods not using deep learning techniques. The competition results show that a combination of methods is outperforming single methods. Furthermore, letters are much more difficult to retrieve than manuscripts.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022A Survey of Historical Document Image Datasetscited by 18
- 2023Towards Writer Retrieval for Historical Datasetscited by 6
- 2024SAGHOG: Self-Supervised Autoencoder for Generating HOG Features for Writer Retrievalcited by 4
- 2024Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Writer Retrievalcited by 4
- 2023Feature Mixing for Writer Retrieval and Identification on Papyri Fragmentscited by 3
- 2024Fetch-A-Set: A Large-Scale OCR-Free Benchmark for Historical Document Retrievalcited by 2
- 2025Towards the Influence of Text Quantity on Writer Retrievalcited by 1
- 2021Neural Representation Learning for Scribal Hands of Linear Bcited by 0
- 2023Cross-codex Learning for Reliable Scribe Identification in Medieval Manuscriptscited by 0
- 2025Exploring text-to-image generation for historical document image retrievalcited by 0
- 2025Beyond the Pipeline: Analyzing Key Factors in End-to-End Deep Learning for Historical Writer Identificationcited by 0
- 2026BullingerDB: A Dataset for Handwritten Text Recognition and Writer Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026BullingerDB: A Dataset for Handwritten Text Recognition and Writer Retrieval28 May 2026
- 2025Beyond the Pipeline: Analyzing Key Factors in End-to-End Deep Learning for Historical Writer Identification21 Oct 2025
- 2025Exploring text-to-image generation for historical document image retrieval28 Jul 2025
- 2025Towards the Influence of Text Quantity on Writer Retrieval9 Jun 2025
- 2024Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Writer Retrieval1 Sep 2024
- 2024Fetch-A-Set: A Large-Scale OCR-Free Benchmark for Historical Document Retrieval11 Jun 2024
- 2024SAGHOG: Self-Supervised Autoencoder for Generating HOG Features for Writer Retrieval26 Apr 2024
- 2023Cross-codex Learning for Reliable Scribe Identification in Medieval Manuscripts7 Dec 2023
- 2023Feature Mixing for Writer Retrieval and Identification on Papyri Fragments22 Jun 2023
- 2023Towards Writer Retrieval for Historical Datasets9 May 2023
- 2022A Survey of Historical Document Image Datasets16 Mar 2022
- 2021Neural Representation Learning for Scribal Hands of Linear B14 Jul 2021