Online Vector Balancing and Geometric Discrepancy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider an online vector balancing question where T vectors, chosen from an arbitrary distribution over [-1,1]n, arrive one-by-one and must be immediately given a ± sign. The goal is to keep the discrepancy small as possible. A concrete example is the online interval discrepancy problem where T points are sampled uniformly in [0,1], and the goal is to immediately color them ± such that every sub-interval remains nearly balanced. As random coloring incurs Omega(T1/2) discrepancy, while the offline bounds are Theta(√n log (T/n)) for vector balancing and 1 for interval balancing, a natural question is whether one can (nearly) match the offline bounds in the online setting for these problems. One must utilize the stochasticity as in the worst-case scenario it is known that discrepancy is Omega(T1/2) for any online algorithm. Bansal and Spencer recently show an O(√nlog T) bound when each coordinate is independent. When there are dependencies among the coordinates, the problem becomes much more challenging, as evidenced by a recent work of Jiang, Kulkarni, and Singla that gives a non-trivial O(T1/loglog T) bound for online interval discrepancy. Although this beats random coloring, it is still far from the offline bound. In this work, we introduce a new framework for online vector balancing when the input distribution has dependencies across coordinates. This lets us obtain a poly(n, log T) bound for online vector balancing under arbitrary input distributions, and a poly(log T) bound for online interval discrepancy. Our framework is powerful enough to capture other well-studied geometric discrepancy problems; e.g., a poly(logd (T)) bound for the online d-dimensional Tusn'ady's problem. A key new technical ingredient is an anti-concentration inequality for sums of pairwise uncorrelated random variables.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2021Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive Adversariescited by 57
- 2022GraB: Finding Provably Better Data Permutations than Random Reshufflingcited by 18
- 2025Streaming Attention Approximation via Discrepancy Theorycited by 9
- 2026Nearly Optimal Attention Coresetscited by 4
- 2022On The Universality of Diagrams for Causal Inference and The Causal Reproducing Propertycited by 2
- 2024Online Fair Allocation of Perishable Resourcescited by 1
- 2026Universal Decision Learnerscited by 1
- 2022Algorithms for Discrepancy, Matchings, and Approximations: Fast, Simple, and Practicalcited by 0
- 2026Discrepancy-Rounded Fair Bandits with Static and Time-Varying Exposure Floorscited by 0
- 2026Discrepancy-Rounded Fair Bandits with Static and Time-Varying Exposure Floors24 Jul 2026
- 2026Universal Decision Learners29 May 2026
- 2026Nearly Optimal Attention Coresets7 May 2026
- 2025Streaming Attention Approximation via Discrepancy Theory11 Feb 2025
- 2024Online Fair Allocation of Perishable Resources4 Jun 2024
- 2022Algorithms for Discrepancy, Matchings, and Approximations: Fast, Simple, and Practical2 Sep 2022
- 2022On The Universality of Diagrams for Causal Inference and The Causal Reproducing Property6 Jul 2022
- 2022GraB: Finding Provably Better Data Permutations than Random Reshuffling22 May 2022
- 2021Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive Adversaries16 Feb 2021