mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Sample Complexity of Learning Sum-Product Networks

arXiv 1912.02765 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2019cs.LG math.ST stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sum-Product Networks (SPNs) can be regarded as a form of deep graphical models that compactly represent deeply factored and mixed distributions. An SPN is a rooted directed acyclic graph (DAG) consisting of a set of leaves (corresponding to base distributions), a set of sum nodes (which represent mixtures of their children distributions) and a set of product nodes (representing the products of its children distributions). In this work, we initiate the study of the sample complexity of PAC-learning the set of distributions that correspond to SPNs. We show that the sample complexity of learning tree structured SPNs with the usual type of leaves (i.e., Gaussian or discrete) grows at most linearly (up to logarithmic factors) with the number of parameters of the SPN. More specifically, we show that the class of distributions that corresponds to tree structured Gaussian SPNs with k mixing weights and e (d-dimensional Gaussian) leaves can be learned within Total Variation error ε using at most widetildeO(fraced2+kε2) samples. A similar result holds for tree structured SPNs with discrete leaves. We obtain the upper bounds based on the recently proposed notion of distribution compression schemes. More specifically, we show that if a (base) class of distributions F admits an "efficient" compression, then the class of tree structured SPNs with leaves from F also admits an efficient compression.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.