Insights into Ordinal Embedding Algorithms: A Systematic Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The objective of ordinal embedding is to find a Euclidean representation of a set of abstract items, using only answers to triplet comparisons of the form "Is item i closer to the item j or item k?". In recent years, numerous algorithms have been proposed to solve this problem. However, there does not exist a fair and thorough assessment of these embedding methods and therefore several key questions remain unanswered: Which algorithms perform better when the embedding dimension is constrained or few triplet comparisons are available? Which ones scale better with increasing sample size or dimension? In our paper, we address these questions and provide the first comprehensive and systematic empirical evaluation of existing algorithms as well as a new neural network approach. We find that simple, relatively unknown, non-convex methods consistently outperform all other algorithms, including elaborate approaches based on neural networks or landmark approaches. This finding can be explained by our insight that many of the non-convex optimization approaches do not suffer from local optima. Our comprehensive assessment is enabled by our unified library of popular embedding algorithms that leverages GPU resources and allows for fast and accurate embeddings of millions of data points.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.
10 papers.
- 2025The Complexity of Finding Local Optima in Contrastive Learningcited by 1
- 2026Provable Accuracy Collapse in Embedding-Based Representations under Dimensionality Mismatchcited by 1
- 2026Scalable and Interpretable Representation Alignment with Ordinal Similaritycited by 1
- 2023Fast Interactive Search with a Scale-Free Comparison Oraclecited by 0
- 2025Measuring IIA Violations in Similarity Choices with Bayesian Modelscited by 0
- 2025Cluster and then Embed: A Modular Approach for Visualizationcited by 0
- 2025Probabilistic Foundations of Fuzzy Simplicial Sets for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reductioncited by 0
- 2026LORE: Jointly Learning the Intrinsic Dimensionality and Relative Similarity Structure From Ordinal Datacited by 0
- 2026Eliciting associations between clinical variables from LLMs via comparison questions across populationscited by 0
- 2026Optimal VC Dimension of Contrastive Learning with Margincited by 0
- 2026Optimal VC Dimension of Contrastive Learning with Margin30 Sep 2026
- 2026Scalable and Interpretable Representation Alignment with Ordinal Similarity15 Jun 2026
- 2026Eliciting associations between clinical variables from LLMs via comparison questions across populations7 May 2026
- 2026Provable Accuracy Collapse in Embedding-Based Representations under Dimensionality Mismatch5 May 2026
- 2026LORE: Jointly Learning the Intrinsic Dimensionality and Relative Similarity Structure From Ordinal Data4 Feb 2026
- 2025Probabilistic Foundations of Fuzzy Simplicial Sets for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction3 Dec 2025
- 2025The Complexity of Finding Local Optima in Contrastive Learning21 Sep 2025
- 2025Cluster and then Embed: A Modular Approach for Visualization27 Aug 2025
- 2025Measuring IIA Violations in Similarity Choices with Bayesian Models20 Aug 2025
- 2023Fast Interactive Search with a Scale-Free Comparison Oracle2 Jun 2023