A Human-in-the-loop Framework to Construct Context-aware Mathematical Notions of Outcome Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing mathematical notions of fairness fail to account for the context of decision-making. We argue that moral consideration of contextual factors is an inherently human task. So we present a framework to learn context-aware mathematical formulations of fairness by eliciting people's situated fairness assessments. Our family of fairness notions corresponds to a new interpretation of economic models of Equality of Opportunity (EOP), and it includes most existing notions of fairness as special cases. Our human-in-the-loop approach is designed to learn the appropriate parameters of the EOP family by utilizing human responses to pair-wise questions about decision subjects' circumstance and deservingness, and the harm/benefit imposed on them. We illustrate our framework in a hypothetical criminal risk assessment scenario by conducting a series of human-subject experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Our work takes an important initial step toward empowering stakeholders to have a voice in the formulation of fairness for Machine Learning.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2022Perspectives on Incorporating Expert Feedback into Model Updatescited by 7
- 2022InterFair: Debiasing with Natural Language Feedback for Fair Interpretable Predictionscited by 7
- 2024Measuring Machine Learning Harms from Stereotypes Requires Understanding Who Is Harmed by Which Errors in What Wayscited by 4
- 2024Toward A Causal Framework for Modeling Perceptioncited by 2
- 2024Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecyclecited by 1
- 2024Fair Clustering: Critique, Caveats, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2024Understanding Decision Subjects' Engagement with and Perceived Fairness of AI Models When Opportunities of Qualification Improvement Existcited by 1
- 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotationcited by 1
- 2022On Learning and Enforcing Latent Assessment Models using Binary Feedback from Human Auditors Regarding Black-Box Classifierscited by 0
- 2022Achievement and Fragility of Long-term Equitabilitycited by 0
- 2026Implementing Causal Perception: Competing SCMs and Situated Fairnesscited by 0
- 2026Implementing Causal Perception: Competing SCMs and Situated Fairness4 Aug 2026
- 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation11 Feb 2026
- 2024Understanding Decision Subjects' Engagement with and Perceived Fairness of AI Models When Opportunities of Qualification Improvement Exist4 Oct 2024
- 2024Fair Clustering: Critique, Caveats, and Future Directions22 Jun 2024
- 2024Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecycle29 Apr 2024
- 2024Measuring Machine Learning Harms from Stereotypes Requires Understanding Who Is Harmed by Which Errors in What Ways6 Feb 2024
- 2024Toward A Causal Framework for Modeling Perception24 Jan 2024
- 2022InterFair: Debiasing with Natural Language Feedback for Fair Interpretable Predictions14 Oct 2022
- 2022Achievement and Fragility of Long-term Equitability24 Jun 2022
- 2022Perspectives on Incorporating Expert Feedback into Model Updates13 May 2022
- 2022On Learning and Enforcing Latent Assessment Models using Binary Feedback from Human Auditors Regarding Black-Box Classifiers16 Feb 2022